THE USE OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS TOOLS BY LATVIAN ENVIRONMENTAL NGOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol1.6515Keywords:
nature conservation, environmental governance, adaptive management, publicity strategiesAbstract
Successful nature conservation requires engagement of diverse groups of stakeholders. Attracting attention of general public and engagement of local communities that underpin sustainable development are between the most important aspects of effective communications by environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs). In the modern world digital tools provide unprecedented opportunities for broadening reach of ENGO communications. In Latvia, many organizations including ENGOs use digital tools as a part of their communications mix. However, it is important to understand to what extent the power of digital strategies is utilised by these organisations. For this purpose, analysis of Latvian ENGO digital strategies was undertaken. The analysis involved evaluation of digital usage by top Latvian ENGOs in comparison to application of online communications tools by similar organizations in Western Europe and in the USA. It was found that while Latvian ENGOs actively use digital communications tools, in comparison with western organizations a range of approaches that make online strategies effective is still underutilised. This may generally reduce reach of the communications and their public appeal. Ultimately, underuse of opportunities provided by digital communication tools may weaken effectiveness of nature conservation at a regional scale. Thus, it is suggested to enhance digital communications taking an example from Western ENGOS by introducing more educational and engaging content in a variety of formats, ranging from audio to video materials. Detailed recommendations based on findings of present review are provided.
Downloads
References
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montreal, the United Nations, 2020.
Aichi Biodiversity Targets [Online]. Available: https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/ [Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021]
M. Kaplan-Hallam and N.J. Bennett, “Adaptive social impact management for conservation and environmental management”, Conservation Biology, vol. 32(2), pp. 304-314 Jul. 2017, DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12985.
S. Pavelle and C. Wilkinson, “Into the Digital Wild: Utilizing Twitter, Instagram, You Tube, and Facebook for Effective Science and Environmental Communication”. Frontiers in Communication, vol. 5(575122), Oct. 2020, DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2020.575122.
A. Lieberman and J. Schroeder “Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes”, Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 31, pp. 16–21, Feb. 2020 , DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.022
Q. Shi, C. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Feng, C. Chen, “Location driven influence maximization: Online spread via offline deployment”, Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 166, pp. 30-41, Feb. 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.12.003.
P. Pacheco-Vega and A. Murdie, “When do environmental NGOs work? A test of the conditional effectiveness of environmental advocacy”, Environmental Policies, vol. 30(1-2), pp. 180-201, DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2020.1785261.
Factmetrics, “Average Internet Speeds By Country”. [Online]. Available: https://www.fastmetrics.com/internet-connection-speed-by-country.php#top-10-worldwide [Accessed: Feb. 17, 2021].
Tefficient, “USA, Latvia and Finland combine: High mobile data usage with fast growth”. [Online]. Available: http://media.tefficient.com/2016/06/tefficient-industry-analysis-3-2016-mobile-data-usage-and-pricing-FY-2015-final2.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 18, 2021].
GMO free Europe, “Latvia”. [Online]. Available: https://www.gmo-free-regions.org/gmo-free-regions/latvia.html [Accessed Feb. 12, 2021].
Buglife, “B-Lines”. [online]. Available: https://www.buglife.org.uk/our-work/b-lines/ [Accessed Feb 14, 2021].
Latvijas Zemes Draugi (in Latvian). [Online]. Available: http://www.zemesdraugi.lv/ [Accessed Feb. 20, 2021]
Latvijas Dabas Fonds (in Latvian). [Online]. Available: https://www.ldf.lv/ [Accessed Feb. 16, 2021]
Vides aizsardzibas klubs (in Latvian). [Online]. Available: http://www.vak.lv/ [Accessed Feb 15, 2021].
Latvijas Zala Josta (in Latvia). [Online]. Available: http://www.zalajosta.lv/lv/biedriba-latvijas-zala-josta-viena-no-lielakajam-vides-aizsardzibas-organizacijam-latvija [Accepted Feb. 20, 2021].
Green Alliance. [Online]. Available: https://green-alliance.org.uk/ [Accessed Feb. 19, 2021].
Friends of the Irish Environment. [Online]. Available: https://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.org/ [Accessed Feb. 20, 2021].
Bund (in German). [Onlie]. Avaiable: https://www.bund.net/ [Accessed Feb. 22, 2021]
The Nature Conservacy. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.org/en-us/ {Accessed Feb: 22, 2021].
D. Grewala, D. Herhausenb, S. Ludwigc anf F.V. Ordenesd, “The future of digital communication research: Considering dynamics and multimodality”, Journal of Retailing, 18 Feb. 2021, [Online serial]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435921000075 [Accessed Accessed Feb. 2, 2021].
R. Dolan, J. Conduit, C. Frethey-Bentham, J. Fahy and S. Goodman, “Social media engagement behavior: A framework for engaging customers through social media content”, European Journal of Marketing, vol.53(10), pp. 2213-2243, Oct. 2019, DOI: 10.1108/EJM-03-2017-0182.
M. Kumaran, “Organizational Capacity Building and Strategic Growth for Environmental NGOs: A Primer”, WEIS (World Environment and Island Studies), vol. 8(1), pp. 11-21, Mar. 2018.
C. Fill, “Essentially a Matter of Consistency: Integrated Marketing Communications”, The Marketing Review, vol. 1, pp. 409-425, Jul. 2001.
F. Miriam, L.S.G. Piccolo, D. Maynard, M. Wippoo, C. Meili, and H. Alani, “Talking Climate Change via Social Media: Communication, Engagement and Behaviour”. In: WebSci ’16 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science, ACM, New York, USA, pp. 85–94, May 2016, DOI: 10.1145/2908131.2908167.
H. Murphy-Gregory, “Governance via persuasion: environmental NGOs and the social licence to operate”, Environmental Policies, vol. 27(2), pp. 320-340, Sep. 2017, DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1373429.
