LOCAL FOOD PROCUREMENT TENDENCIES IN LATVIA

Authors

  • Inita Krivašonoka Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Economics and Social Development (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol1.4175

Keywords:

Local food, public procurement, regional development

Abstract

The OECD has emphasized that regions need to boost their growth by placing local resources and means in circulation in order to benefit from their competitive advantages. It encourages the search and analysis of those regional key factors that are driving development in the regions. Local authorities can boost their region with the use of territorial capital and the promotion of entrepreneurship. One of the ways how to do this is to buy food from local producers. Giving preference to local suppliers, even if it means spending a little more, can actually benefit a region’s finances. When local governments spend their money on locally owned firms, those firms in turn rely on and generate local supply chains, creating an “economic multiplier” effect. Each additional dollar that circulates locally boosts local economic activity, employment and, ultimately, tax revenue. In Latvia, since 2014, attention has been focused on increasing the consumption of local food. Improvements in regulatory enactments have been made, which stipulate that green public procurement criteria should be used in food procurement, where one of the criteria, the supply distance, directly contributes to this aim by giving preference to the local producers. The research aim is to analyze the data of local government food procurements carried out in Latvia from 2010 to 2018 and to evaluate the share of local suppliers in these procurements. The food procurement winners were divided into four groups: agricultural producers, food processing companies, wholesale companies and retail companies. The study evaluates how each group's share in total food purchases varies over the years, and how procurement volumes vary depending on the winner's belonging to the one of the groups previously defined. Such an analysis shows the proportion of local producers in procurement, but does not fully reflect on the volume of local production, as it is not possible to obtain data on the share of production which producer purchased from others to provide the necessary volumes of food, and there is no data on the origin of products supplied by wholesalers. The following research methods were employed to carry out the present research: analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, the monographic method, statistical analysis and the graphic method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Khairullov, “Challenges of Sustainable Development of Regional Economy in The Conditions of Russia's Accession to The World Trade Organization”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 23, 2015, pp.303 – 308.

OECD, “How Regions Grow”, The OECD Policy Briefs, March, 2009. Available: http://www.oecd.org/regional/searf2009/42576934.pdf. [Accessed March 11, 2019].

I.Krivasonoka, A.Zvirbule,” Role of municipalities in local food distribution in Latvia”, Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference “ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT” No 41, 2016, pp.96-103.

C. McCrudden., “Using Public Procurement to Achieve Social Outcomes” Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 28, 2004, pp.257–267. Available: https://ccednet-rcdec.ca/sites/ccednet-rcdec.ca/files/ccednet/pdfs/2004-mccrudden-public_procurement.pdf. [Accessed February 23, 2019].

EC, “Public procurement”, European Semester Thematic Factsheet, 2017. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic-factsheet_public-procurement_en_0.pdf. . [Accessed February 23, 2019].

European University Association, “A comparative analysis of public procurement frameworks and practices in universities in Portugal and selected EU member states”, EUA Report, 2018. Available: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/eua%20public%20procurement%20report_final_28.11.2018.pdf. [Accessed February 23, 2019].

N. Caldwell, H. Walker, C. Harland, L. Knight, J. Zheng and T. Waleley, “Promoting competitive markets: the role of public procurement”, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol 11, 2005, pp. 242-251.

K. Loader, “The Challenge of Competitive Procurement: Value for Money versus Small Business Support”, Public Money & Management, November, 2007, pp. 307-314.

J. Smith, G. Andersson, R. Gourlay, S. Karner, M. Bent Egberg , R. Sonnino and D. Barling, “Balancing competing policy demands: the case of sustainable public sector food procurement”, Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 112, 2016, pp. 249-256.

K-.J. Morgan, R. Sonnino, The School Food Revolution: Public Food and the Challenge of Sustainable Development. Oxford: Earthscan, Oxford, 2008.

H. Walker, L. Preuss, “Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: public sector perspectives”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16, 2008, pp. 1600-1609.

H. Risku-Norja, “Local food and public food procurement”, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Economy & Society, 2016. Available: http://orgprints.org/30835/1/Local%20food%20and%20public%20food%20procurementIFSA%202016%20.pdf. [Accessed February 27, 2019].

A. Pringle, “The Power of Purchasing: The Economic Impacts of Local Procurement”, Columbia Institute, LOCO BC, ISIS Research Centre, May, 2013, p.18.

A. Patel, G. Martin, “Buying Local: An Economic Impact Analysis of Portland, Maine”, Maine Center for Economic Policy, December, 2011. Available: https://www.mecep.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/MECEP_Report_-_Buying_Local-12-5-2011.pdf. [Accessed February 26, 2019].

EC, Buying Social. A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerationsin Public Procurement, 2010. Available: https://buysocialdirectory.org.uk/sites/default/files/eul14136_socconsidpubprocu_1012101.pdf. [Accessed February 24, 2019].

EC, Green and sustainable public procurement, 2016. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/versus_en.htm). [Accessed February 11, 2019].

H. Risku-Norja and A. Løes, “Organic food in food policy and in public catering: Lessons learned from finland”, Organic Agriculture, 2016, pp. 1-14.

EkoCentria, “More local food for the customers of public-sector kitchens”, Grounds and guidelines for procurement, 2013. Available: http://www.ekocentria.fi/resources/public/Aineistot/LahiruokaopasENG.pdf. [Accessed March 10, 2019].

Public Procurement Law, Law of the Republic of Latvia, 2017. Available: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=287760 [Accessed February 11, 2019].

I. Krivasonoka, A.Zvirbule, “Challenges and possible solutions in different stages of public food procurement”, Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, Varazdin, 2017, pp. 343-352.

Requirements for green public procurement and the procedure for their application, Cabinet Regulations No.353, 2017. Available: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=291867. [Accessed February 11, 2019].

Procurement Monitoring Bureau, Statistical data, 2019. Available: https://www.iub.gov.lv/lv/node/184. [Accessed January 19, 2019].

Latvia University of Agriculture, “Comparative analysis of competitiveness indicators of Latvian food industry”, Study report, 2013. Available: https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/ck/files/ZM/TP%20petijumi/pet_partikas_konkuretsp.pdf). [Accessed February 12, 2019].

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

[1]
I. Krivašonoka, “LOCAL FOOD PROCUREMENT TENDENCIES IN LATVIA”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 118–122, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.17770/etr2019vol1.4175.