SUSTAINABLE VALUE CREATION IN LATVIA, LITHUANIA AND ESTONIA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC RETURN FROM THE USE OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2017vol1.2628Keywords:
sustainable development, Sustainable Value, Gross Domestic Product, Latvia, Lithuania, EstoniaAbstract
Baltic neighbouring countries Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia all over the world are considered as brotherly nations that have similar historical events and political economic system. However, for the period of 25 years after gaining their independence from the Soviet Union in 1990, these countries have been implementing different socio-economic development models. It can be concluded on the achieved development results by the world recognized and widely used index indicators as Human Development Index (HDI), Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), Doing Business Index (DBI), revealing a trend that Estonia according to the socio-economic indicators is a step ahead of both Latvia and Lithuania. However, the above-mentioned indices calculation does not include the environmental indicators (HDI report includes Environmental Sustainability subindex, which is calculated separately) that cannot take account of national sustainable development which is becoming increasingly important under the conditions of global resource scarcity. The aim of the research is to determine sustainability of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, using the Sustainable Value (SV) approach, calculating how efficiently and with what return (Country's Gross Domestic Product) their economic, social and environmental resources are consumed. SV is a value-based assessment that measures contributions to sustainability in monetary terms while being able to use non-monetary environmental and social input variables. Calculating SV of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, the author has used 10 indicators of 2014 that cover the economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability, using the average efficiency of these countries as benchmark. As a result the author concluded that, overall, Latvia and Lithuania have almost equal footing with the Return to Cost Ratio (RCR) results, respectively 1.41 and 1.32 (>1 means that resources are used more efficiently than the benchmark), while Estonia's RCR value is 0.52 (<1 means that resources are used less efficiently than the benchmark), which can be explained by differences in national economic structure and the energy independence. The study also showed that there are substantial differences among the countries in economic return from each individual resource use.Downloads
References
S. Jahan, Human Development Report 2015. Work for Human Development. United Nation Development Programme, 2015.
K. Schwab and X. Sala-i-Martin, The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017. World Economic Forum, 2016.
Doing Business 2017. Equal Opportunity for All. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2016.
F. Figge, “Environmental Value Added - a New Approach to Measuring Eco-Efficiency”, Z. Angew. Umweltforsch, 14, pp.184-197, 2001.
F Figge and T. Hahn, “Sustainable value added - measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency,” Ecological Economics, 48, pp.173-187, 2004.
S. Manzhynski, N. Siniak, A. Zróbek-Rózanska, S. Zróbek, “Sustainability performance in the Baltic Sea Region”, Land Use Policy, 57, pp.489-498, 2016.
D. H. Meadows, D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, W. W. Behrens III, The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972.
L. Fei, S. Dong, L. Xue, L. Q. Liang, W. Yang, “Energy consumption-economic growth relationship and carbon dioxide emissions in China,” Energy Policy, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp. 568–574, 2011.
K. Alkhathlan and M. Javid, “Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis,” Energy Policy, Volume 62, pp.1525–1532, 2013.
E. A. Rosa and A. Diekmann, T. Dietz, C. Jaeger, Human Footprints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability. London: The MIT Press, 2010.
A. K. Jorgenson, “Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Central and Eastern European Nations, 1992-2005: A Test of Ecologically Unequal Exchange Theory,” Human Ecology, Rev. 18, pp. 105-114, 2011.
A. Jorgenson and B. Clark, V. Giedraitis, “The temporal (in)stability of the carbon dioxide emissions/economic development relationship in Central and Eastern European nations,” Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 25, pp.1182-1192, 2012.
A. Jorgenson and B. Clark, “Societies consuming nature: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations 1960–2003,” Social Science Research, Vol. 40, pp. 226–244, 2011.
P. Knox, J. Agnew, L. McCarthy, The Geography of the World Economy, 6th edition. London: Routledge, 2014.
World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (The Brundtland Report). Oxford /New York: Oxford University Press, 1987. [Online]. Available: www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations General Assembly, 21 October 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Science for Environment Policy, Indicators for Sustainable Cities, in-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/indicators_for_sustainable_cities_IR12_en.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
Forum for the Future, The Five Capitals, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.forumforthefuture.org/project/five-capitals/overview. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
N. R. Goodwin, Five Kinds of Capital: Useful Concepts for Sustainable Development. Global Development and Environment Institute, Working Paper No. 03-07, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/publications/working_papers/03-07sustainabledevelopment.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
J. Birkeland, Positive Development: From Vicious Circles to Virtuous Cycles Through Built Environment Design. Earthscan Ltd., 2008.
T. Everett, M. Ishwaran, G. P. Ansaloni, A. Rubin, Economic Growth and the Environment. Defra Evidence and Analysis Series. Paper 2, Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69195/pb13390-economic-growth-100305.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
P. Ekins, Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: The Prospects for Green Growth. London: Routledge, 2000.
K. Scott, J. Barrett, G. Baiocchi, J. Minx, Meeting the UK climate change challenge: The contribution of resource efficiency. WRAP Project EVA128. Report prepared by Stockholm Environment Institute and University of Durham Business School, Waste & Resources Action Programme, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Final%20Report%20EVA128_SEI%20(1)%20JB%20SC%20JB3.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
T. Hahn, F. Figge, R. Barkemeyer, “Sustainable value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector,” International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 8, pp. 496-512, 2007.
T. Hahn, F. Figge, R. Barkemeyer, A. Liesen, F. Müller, Sustainable Value in Automobile Manufacturing: an Analysis of the Sustainability Performance of the Automobile Manufacturers Worldwide, 3rd ed. Sustainable Value Ltd., 2013. [Online]. Available: http://sustainablevalue.com/downloads/sustainablevalueinautomobilemanufacturing3rded.pdf . [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
F. Ang, S. Van Passel, E. Mathijs, “An aggregate resource efficiency perspective on sustainability: a sustainable value application to the EU-15 countries,” Ecological Economics, 71, pp. 99-110, 2011.
S. Manzhynski, F. Figge, L. Hassel, “Sustainable Value creation of nine countries of the Baltic region. Value, changes and drivers,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, pp. 637-646, 2015.
Sustainable Value of European Industry: A Value-Based Analysis of the Environmental Performance of European Manufacturing Companies. Full Version. The ADVANCE project, 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.advance-project.org/downloads/advancesurveyfullversion.pdf. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Latvijas Republikas Centrālās Statistikas pārvalde, Komersantu (komercsabiedrību) finansiālie rādītāji gada beigās, UFG01, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/ekfin/ekfin__ikgad__uznemfin/UF0010_euro.px/?rxid=cdcb978c-22b0-416a-aacc-aa650d3e2ce0. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Lietuvos statistikos departamentas, Total assets of enterprises, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://osp.stat.gov.lt/en/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize?portletFormName=visualization&hash=96c74c44-6ee9-40cb-9306-5461b5c37c5b. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Statistics Estonia, Enterprises' assets, liabilities and equity by economic activity (EMTAK 2008) and number of persons employed, FS009, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/Dialog/varval.asp?ma=FS009&ti=ENTERPRISES%27+ASSETS%2C+LIABILITIES+AND+EQUITY+BY+ECONOMIC+ACTIVITY+%28EMTAK+2008%29+AND+NUMBER+OF+PERSONS+EMPLOYED&path=../I_Databas/Economy/09Financial_statistics_of_enterprises/02Enterprises_assets/02Annual_statistics/&lang=1. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Carbon dioxide, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Nitrogen oxides, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Sulphur oxides, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Non-methane volatile organic compounds, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Air emissions accounts by NACE Rev. 2 activity. Methane, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Generation of waste by waste category, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&pcode=ten00108&language=en. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
World Bank. Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (billion cubic meters), 2014. [Online]. Available: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ER.H2O.FWTL.K3. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Latvijas Republikas Centrālās Statistikas pārvalde, Nodarbinātie pa vecuma grupām un pēc dzimuma, NBG07, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/Sociala/Sociala__ikgad__nodarb/NB0070.px/?rxid=cdcb978c-22b0-416a-aacc-aa650d3e2ce0. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Lietuvos statistikos departamentas, Employed persons, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://osp.stat.gov.lt/web/guest/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize?portletFormName=visualization&hash=34b4b212-89cf-4844-b4f0-16a2864eec68. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Statistics Estonia, Employed persons by full/part-time job in main job, ML220, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.stat.ee/37204?highlight=employed,persons. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
Eurostat, Accidents at work by sex, age, severity, NACE Rev. 2 activity and workstation, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
International Monetary Fund, Gross domestic product based on purchasing-power-parity (PPP) valuation of country GDP, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2015/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2013&ey=2020&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=84&pr1.y=8&c=946%2C939%2C941&s=NGDPD%2CPPPGDP%2CLE&grp=0&a=#download. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
A. Liesen, F. Müller, F. Figge, T. Hahn, Sustainable Value Creation by Chemical Companies. Sustainable Value Research, 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.sustainablevalue.com/downloads/sustainablevaluecreationbychemicalcompanies.pdf. [Accessed: December 15, 2016].
R. J. Baumgartner, “Corporate sustainability performance: methods and illustrative example,” The International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 3 (2), pp. 117–131, 2008.
F. Figge, T. Hahn, “The cost of sustainability capital and the creation of sustainable value by companies,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9 (4), pp. 47–58, 2005.
T. J. Weyers, Energy Security of the Baltic States. Bachelor Thesis, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/21000. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
A. Mae, “Estonian Energy Strategy and its implications to the Regional Cooperation,” In:
A.Spruds and T.Rostoks, eds. 2009. Energy: Pulling the Baltic Sea Region Together or Apart? Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs, pp.250-282, 2009.
Eurostat, Gross inland energy consumption by fuel type, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tsdcc320&language=en. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
European Commission, Energy Markets in the European Union in 2011. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/energy-markets-in-the-european-union-in-2011-pbMJAE12001/. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
M. Maigre, Energy Security Concerns of the Baltic States. International Centre for Defence Studies, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.icds.ee/fileadmin/media/icds.ee/failid/Merle_Maigre-Energy_Security_Concers_of_the_Baltic_States.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
M. Saul, K. Antso, Estonian environmental indicators – development and outcomes. Estonian Environment Agency, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.keskkonnainfo.ee/failid/indikaatorid_ENG_web.pdf. [Accessed: January 7, 2017].
