THE ISSUE OF USING TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE DETECTION OF FORGED DOCUMENTS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND LINE OF CONTROL

Authors

  • Aigars Smirnovs Mg.soc.sc., State Border Guard College of the Republic of Latvia Border Guard and Immigration Services Subjects’ Department (LV)
  • Inta Pokule Mg.soc.sc., State Border Guard College of the Republic of Latvia Border Guard and Immigration Services Subjects’ Department, Lecturer (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8311

Keywords:

border check, documents, equipment, forgery detection methods, UV light

Abstract

The study examines issues related to technical equipment for document verification and detection of forged documents in the first and second line. Today, counterfeiters use increasingly innovative methods and equipment, which necessitates the improvement of technologies for identifying counterfeit documents. The novelty of the research lies in the comparative analysis of the work efficiency of technical equipment in both the first and second line, with the aim of detecting and detecting various types of forged documents. The goal is to analyze the effectiveness of currently used technical equipment and the problems that can be encountered in the study and detection of forged documents. The procedure itself during border control is analyzed for them, as well as solutions to problems are given. The main tasks are the specifics and available functions of the existing technical equipment, solving problems in the use of these technical equipment, offering solutions.

References

Doculus Lumus®. (n.d.). Accessories. Retrieved from https://www.doculuslumus.com/accessories/

Doculus Lumus®. (n.d.). The mobile document checking device. Retrieved from https://www.doculuslumus.com/discover/

Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes regula (ES) 2016/399. (2016). Par Savienības Kodeksu par noteikumiem, kas reglamentē personu pārvietošanos pār robežām (Šengenas Robežu kodekss) (kodificēta redakcija). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399

Front-line Border Control Device. (n.d.). Regula 4205D. Retrieved from https://regulaforensics.com/products/manual-control-devices/4205d/

Krastiņš, U., Liholaja, V., & Niedre, A. (2007). Krimināllikuma zinātniski praktiskais komentārs: 3. Sevišķā daļa. Rīga: Firma "AFS".

Krimināllikums: LR likums. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/id/88966-kriminallikums

Mincs, P., & Liholaja, V. (2005). Krimināltiesības ar V. Liholajas komentāriem. Rīga: Tiesu namu aģentūra.

Noteikumi par robežpārbaudei un robežuzraudzībai nepieciešamajiem tehniskajiem līdzekļiem. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/id/214195-noteikumi-par-robezparbaudei-un-robezuzraudzibai-nepieciesamajiem-tehniskajiem-lidzekliem

Robežsargu rokasgrāmata. (2019, October 8).

Video Spectral Comparator. (n.d.). Regula 4305DMH. Retrieved from https://regulaforensics.com/products/video-spectral-comparators/4305/

Downloads

Published

20.02.2025

How to Cite

Smirnovs, A., & Pokule, I. (2025). THE ISSUE OF USING TECHNICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE DETECTION OF FORGED DOCUMENTS IN THE FIRST AND SECOND LINE OF CONTROL. BORDER SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT, 5(10), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8311