POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES OF PREDICTIVE PROFILING IN THE STATE BORDER GUARD

Authors

  • Juris Madžuls Mg.soc.sc, docent, the State Border Guard College of the Republic of Latvia (LV)
  • Daina Znotiņa Mg.soc.sc, lecturer, Rezekne Academy of Technologies (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8306

Keywords:

border guard, predictive, profiling, risk, threat

Abstract

The paper is aimed to investigate the role of predictive profiling (hereafter PP) in the fight against cross-border crime and terrorism. The main tasks of the article are to describe the content of PP, the added value of its implementation and how it can be used in the State Border Guard Service of the Republic of Latvia (hereafter SBGS) as a complement to risk assessment in operational situations. The authors of the paper explores the content of the PP implemented in the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee (hereafter KMar), as well as in Slovakia, Spain and several Central Asia region countries. For this purpose analysis and evaluation of documents, scientific, pedagogical and psychological literature was performed and suggestions for the improvement of border guard service threat detection system in the field of PP were compiled.
The paper outlines the goal of PP, which is to identify, assess, and take action on a potential criminal or terrorist threat as early as possible (preferably during preparatory actions). Deviant behaviour in combination with Attacker Method of Operation forms a key concept. The AMO provides the indicators for the deviant behaviour. Furthermore, the paper delves into the system of PP and its corresponding process steps. PP is focused on the threat, not the risk, making it a threat analysis.

References

Azuma, R., Daily, M., & Furmanski, C. (2006). A review of time-critical decision-making models and human cognitive processes. 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Big Sky, MT, USA.

Blaha, L. M. (2018). Interactive OODA processes for operational joint human-machine intelligence. NATO Science and Technology Organization (STO).

Boyd, J. R. (1987). Organic design for command and control. In A discourse on winning and losing. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University Press.

Boyd, J. R. (1996). The essence of winning and losing. Unpublished lecture notes. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL.

Boyd, J. R. (2018). A discourse on winning and losing. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University Press.

De Ruijter, A., & Guldenmund, F. (2016). The Bowtie method: A review. Safety Science, 88, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.001

Fadok, D. S. (1995). John Boyd and John Warden: Air Power's quest for strategic paralysis. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: School of Advanced Airpower Studies, Air University.

Hashemi-Pour, C. (2023). What is the OODA loop? TechTarget. Retrieved from https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/OODA-loop

Krogerus, M., & Tschäppeler, R. (2012). The decision book: 50 models for strategic thinking. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

LaFree, G., & Freilich, J. D. (2016). The handbook of the criminology of terrorism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

Mulder, P. (2014). Predictive profiling terrorism.

Reason, J. (1990). The contribution of latent human failures to the breakdown of complex systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 327(1241), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1990.0090

Staff, T. (2021). 35 years after El Al bomb plot, security staff recount stopping unwitting bomber. The Times of Israel. Retrieved from https://www.timesofisrael.com/35-years-after-el-al-bomb-plot-security-staff-recount-stopping-unwitting-bomber/

TorchStone. (2022). The importance of understanding the attack cycle. TorchStone Global. Retrieved from https://www.torchstoneglobal.com/the-importance-of-understanding-the-attack-cycle/

Zenko, M. (2015). Red team: How to succeed by thinking like the enemy. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

20.02.2025

How to Cite

Madžuls, J., & Znotiņa, D. (2025). POSSIBILITIES AND CHALLENGES OF PREDICTIVE PROFILING IN THE STATE BORDER GUARD. BORDER SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT, 5(10), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8306