PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF MASS DISORDERS IN THE BORDER ZONE AND BORDER AREA OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA

Authors

  • Konstantins Korklis Academic master's degree, assistant, State Border Guard College (LV)
  • Sergejs Talapins Professional bachelor's degree, lecturer, State Border Guard College (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8299

Keywords:

border strip, control, external border, mass disorder, prevention, state border strips

Abstract

The article "Prevention and Control of Mass Disorders in the Border Zone and Border Area of the Republic of Latvia" focuses on evaluating the likelihood of mass disorders and assessing the preventive and control measures implemented by the State Border Guard of Latvia. The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of border surveillance in the 12-meter-wide border zone and the 2-kilometer-wide borders, with particular attention to potential threats along the Latvian - Belarus border. The study concludes that proactive measures and sufficient resource allocation are crucial for maintaining border stability. This article aims to study and evaluate the existing mass disorder prevention and control mechanisms in the state border zone and border zone of the Republic of Latvia. As well as develop recommendations for their improvement (Leonard.S. & Kaunert.C., 2021). Research methods: Several research methods were used in the study, including analysis of documents and legal acts, quantitative and qualitative data analysis, as well as case studies of previous incidents of mass disorders on the border of the EU. Primary and secondary sources (scientific literature) were used for data extraction.
The tasks of the article are:
1. To analyze the current regulatory framework and operational strategies of the Border Guard.
2. To assess the experience of Latvia and other European Union countries in this field.
3. Identify the main risk factors and threats that can cause mass disorders in the border area.
4. Develop recommendations for the improvement of regulatory framework and operational activities.

References

Baltic Security Strategy Project. (2022). Hybrid Threats in the Baltic Region. Tallinn: International Centre for Defence and Security.

Bigo, D. (2014). The (in)securitization practices of the three borders in Europe: The Schengen border, the refugee camp border, and the cyberspace border.

European Union. (2022). Schengen Borders Code. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0399

Frontex. (2022). Risk Analysis for 2022. Warsaw: European Border and Coast Guard Agency.

International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2022). Migration Trends in Eastern Europe. Geneva: IOM.

Latvian State Border Guard. (2022). Annual Report 2022. Riga: Latvian State Border Guard.

Latvian State Border Guard. (2023). Overview of Border Incidents. Riga: Latvian State Border Guard.

Leonard, S., & Kaunert, C. (2021). Border Security in the European Union: Frontex and securitization of migration.

Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Latvia. (2022). National Security Strategy. Riga: Ministry of Interior.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2022). Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/global-trends-report-2022

Downloads

Published

20.02.2025

How to Cite

Korklis, K., & Talapins, S. (2025). PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF MASS DISORDERS IN THE BORDER ZONE AND BORDER AREA OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA. BORDER SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT, 5(10), 107-116. https://doi.org/10.17770/bsm.v5i10.8299