THE DATA SUBJECT’S RIGHTS AND LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v2i83.3462Keywords:
data processing of individuals, privacy, administrative responsibility, civil liabilityAbstract
With the development of information technology, data processing tools for individuals are increasingly used in various areas of life. Their accessibility and simplicity in circulation lead to more and more mass application of technologies in the lives of individuals, organizations, and society. Personal data of individuals are subject to turnover, inevitably there is a need to protect the carriers of this data from using the information received against their rights and interests. Despite the urgency of the problem, the concept of the subject of protection does not have a clear definition, as a result, the participants in legal relations will seek to interpret it depending on their needs. The law determines the administrative responsibility for the violation of the processing of data of individuals, but does not provide for special mechanisms for compensation for the damage caused. Consequently, there is an urgent need to specify the norms related to the protection of these individuals.
References
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 10th December 1948, General Assembly resolution 217A.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 16th December 1966, General Assembly resolution 2200A.
Par Latvijas Republikas pievienošanos starptautisko tiesību dokumentiem cilvēktiesību jautājumos. Augstākās Padomes 04.05.1990. deklarācija / Ziņotājs, 21, 24.05.1990.
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 4th November 1950.
Šmite D., Dosbergs D., Borzovs J. Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas nozares tiesību un standartu pamati. Latvijas Universitāte, 2005., 72. lpp.
Treaty on European Union. OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OJ C 326/391, 26.10.2012.
Fizisko personu datu aizsardzības likums. 23.03.2000. likums/LV, 123/124 (2034/2035), 06.04.2000., Ziņotājs, 9, 04.05.2000. Zaudējis spēku.
Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Direktīva 95/46/EK par personu aizsardzību attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi un šādu datu brīvu apriti. Oficiālais Vēstnesis L 281, 23/11/1995, 0031. – 0050. lpp.
Eiropas parlamenta un Padomes Regula (ES) 2016/679 par fizisku personu aizsardzību attiecībā uz personas datu apstrādi un šādu datu brīvu apriti un ar ko atceļ Direktīvu 95/46/EK (Vispārīgā datu aizsardzības regula), OV L 119, 4.5.2016., 1./88.
Fizisko personu datu apstrādes likums. “Latvijas Vēstnesis”, 132 (6218),04.07.2018.
Likumprojekts “Personas datu apstrādes likums”. https://www.tm.gov.lv/ files/l1_MjAxNy9UTUxpa18xMDA5MTdfZGF0aS5kb2N4/2017/TM-Lik_100917_dati.docx
Privacy and Human Rights. An international Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments. Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, 2001, p. 3.
Warren S., Brandeis L. The right to Privacy. Harvard Law Review 193-220 (1890), from Privacy and Human Rights. An international Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments. Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, 2001, p. 4.
Alan F. Westin. Privacy and Freedom. Athenaeum, 1967, from Privacy and Human Rights. An international Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, 2001, p. 4.
Privacy and the Limits of Law. Yale Law Journal. 421, 4528 (1980), from Privacy and Human Rights. An international Survey of Privacy Laws and Developments, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, 2001, p. 4.
Carter-Ruck P. F. The Calcutt Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters. International legal practitioner, 1990. http://heinonline.org/HOL/ LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ilp15&div=31&id=&page=
Gonzales Fuster G. The emergence of personal data protection as a fundamental right of the EU. Springer, London, 2014, p. 24.
Solove D. J. Understanding Privacy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, p. 101.
Latvijas Administratīvo pārkāpumu kodekss. 07.12.1984. likums/Ziņotājs, 51, 20.12.1984.
Apsardzes darbības likums. 13.02.2014. likums/LV, 47 (5107), 06.03.2014.
Maksātnespējas likums. 26.07.2010. likums/LV, 124 (4316), 06.08.2010.
Būvniecības likums. 09.07.2013. likums/LV, 146 (4952), 30.07.2013. 24 Civillikums. 28.01.1937. likums/Valdības Vēstnesis, 41, 20.02.1937.
05.2016. Latvijas Republikas Satversmes tiesas Spriedums lietā Nr.2015-14-0103, http://www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2017-15-01_Spriedums-1.pdf.
Case of L.H. v. Latvia, Application no. 52019/07. https://hudoc. echr.coe.int/eng#{%22appno%22:[%2252019/07%22],%22item id%22:[%22001-142673%22]}.
04.2016 Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Administratīvo lietu departamenta. Spriedums lietā Nr.A420617410. http://at.gov.lv/files/files/15ska-2016.doc.
