PRIORITY OF CONSTITUTION AND POSITION OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES IN LEGAL SOURCES SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v1i74.2886Abstract
Daudzās valstīs ir noteikts, ka Konstitūcija ir nozīmīgākais tiesību akts un starptautiskās saistības nevar ietekmēt Konstitūcijas demokrātisko pamatu. Cilvēktiesību garantēšana ir demokrātiskas valsts pamatprincips, kā arī tiesiskas valsts elements. Cilvēka tiesību un pamatbrīvību aizsardzības konvencijas preambulā noteikts, ka šīs pamatbrīvības vislabāk var nodrošināt ar efektīvas politiskas demokrātijas palīdzību. Analizējot Satversmes tiesas un Somijas Augstākās tiesas spriedumus, secināts, ka Konstitūcijai ir prioritāra nozīme, ja Cilvēka tiesību un pamatbrīvību aizsardzības konvencijas normu interpretācijas gaitā radušās konstitucionāli - tiesiskas kolīzijasReferences
The Constitution of Republic of Finland. Section 107 – Subordination of lower-level statutes.
Giancarlo Parretti v. United States. 112 F. 3d 1363. U.S.Court of Appeals, 9th Cir. , May 6, 1997.
Bederman David J. International Law Frameworks. New York, 2001. P. 158.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Nov. 13, 1987.
Henkin L. International Law as Law in the United States, 82 Mich.L.Rev. 1555, 1565 n. 34 (1984) noting that in several European countries treaties prevail over all inconsistent statutes.
Henkin L. United States Sovereignty, 100 Harv.L.Rev. at 870.
Italian Constitutional Court, June 27, 1996, Venezia v. Ministero di Grazia e Giustizia. Judgment No.223. Rivista di Diritto Internazionale 815.
Осминин Б.И. Заключение и имплементация международных договоров и внутригосударственное право. Инфотропик, 2010. ISBN 978-5-9998-0005-3; 2010.
Judgment of 13 May 2005 by the Constitutional Court in Case No. 2004-18-0106, Para 5 of the Findings.
Case of Görgülü v. Germany, Application no. 74969/01, 26 February 2004.
German Federative Constitutional Court October 14, 2004. Judgment in the case 2BVR 1481/04.
Case of Maggio and Others v. Italy, Applications nos. 46286/09, 52851/08, 53727/08, 54486/08 and 56001/08, 32 May 2011. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.
Case of Scordino v. Italy (№ 1), pp. 51. 29 March 2006, № 36813/97.
Case of Frodl v. Austria. Application 20201/04. 8 April 2010, para 24. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.
Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, 9 April 2002, para 34. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.
Case of Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2). Application no. 74025/01. 6 October 2005. para 71.
Ibid., para 33.
Case of Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, no. 47316/99, § 39, 20 February 2003;
Case of Wittek v. Germany, no. 37290/97, 12 December 2002; Case of Jahn and Others v. Germany, nos. 46720/99, 72203/01 and 72552/01), 30 June 2005; Case of Glässner v. Germany, no.46362/99, 28 June 2001; Case of Brualla Gómez de la Torre v. Spain, 19 December 1997.
President of the Supreme Court of Finland from 2006–2015, a judge of the Supreme Court with the years 2000–2006. Since January 2016 the judge of the ECHR from Finland.
Helsingin Sanomat, 10 January 2016. The supremacy of law is under threat in Finland.
ККО:2015:14. Judgment of Supreme Court of Finland, para 35.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court in the case No.2009-01-01, para 12.2.
