Plagiarism Reducing Aspects in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Model

Sintija Sudmale

Abstract


Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is a practical answer to futuristic e-Europe educational vision. Unsuccessfully organized collaborative work within teams of students, which ignores individual achievement and individual/ group responsibility balance, can lead to lack of motivation for personal involvement and promote plagiarism. The aim of this research is to theoretically analyze the plagiarism reducing aspects with computer supported collaborative learning.Applied study method - analyses of scientific sources. The main results are connected with the research of possibilities to solve the problem of plagiarism in education with modern cooperation methods.

Keywords


computer supported collaborative learning; group work; plagiarism; plagiarism reducing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boisvert, R. F., Irwin, M. J. (2006). Plagiarism on the Rise. Communications of the ACM, 49 (6), 23-24.

Bule J. (2011).Modeļu kopa adaptīvās datorizētās mācīšanās pārvaldībai. (Disertācija) Rīga: RTU, 297 lpp.

Cabral-Cardoso, C. (2004). Ethical Misconduct in the Business School: A Case of Plagiarism that Turned Bitter. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 75–89.

Davis, L. (2011). Arresting student plagiarism: Are we investigators or Educators? Business Communication Quarterly, 74 (2), 160-163.

Dougiamas, M. (2000). Improving the effectiveness of tools for Internet based education. Teaching and Learning Forum 2000. Proceedings Contents, Retrieved from: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/dougiamas.html

Dubra, E. (2004). Latvijas ekonomikas attīstības virzieni, integrējoties Eiropas Savienībā. LU Raksti, Ekonomika, 671(3), 54 – 63.

Duff, A.H., Rogers, D.P., Harris, M.B. (2006). International engineering students—avoiding plagiarism through understanding the Western academic context of scholarship. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31 (6), 673–681.

Duggan, F. (2006). Plagiarism: prevention, practice and policy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31 (2), 151–154.

Engelmann, T., Tergan, S.O., Hesse, F.W. (2010). Evoking knowledge and information awareness for enhancing computer-supported collaborative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78, 1-20.

Glasersfeld, E. (1990).An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher and N. Noddings (Eds), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematicsReston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics pp 19-29.

Glendinning, I. (2013). Reports on Plagiarism policies in 27 different European countries. Retrieved from http://ippheae.eu/project-results

Gorbāns I. (2010). “Ceļā uz multipolāru IKT sabiedrību”. Daugavpils Universitātes 51. starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences materiāli, 2. sējums, 162.-173.

Hall, S. E. (2011). Is it happening? How to avoid the Deleterious effects of plagiarism and cheating in your courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 74 (2), 179-182.

Irons, A. D. (2004). Using Portfolios in Assessment to Reduce Plagiarism. Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference, Conference Proceedings: [electronic resource],(97-103). Newcastle: Northumbria University.

Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community: Proceedings of CSCL 2002. Boulder, CO: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 17-22.

Kumar, V., (1996). Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Issues for Research. Paper presented at Graduate Symposium, University of Saskatchewan.

Waite, M.W., Jackson, M.H., Diwan, A. Leonardi, P.M., (2004). Student culture vs group work in computer science. In Daniel T. Joyce; Deborah Knox; Wanda Dann and Thomas L. Naps, ed., 'SIGCSE' , Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ACM, pp. 12-16.

Piaget, J. (1968). Genetic epistemology New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Pickard, J. (2006). Staff and student attitudes to plagiarism at University College Northampton, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(2), 215-32.

Probett, C. (2011). Plagiarism prevention. Business Communication Quarterly, 74 (2), 170-172.

Rust, C. (2002). Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centered Assessment Practices? Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(2), 145-158.

Sarmiento-Klapper, J.W. (2009). Bridging mechanisms in team-based online problem solving: Continuity in building collaborative knowledge. Unpublished Dissertation, Ph.D., College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University. Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Selwyn, N. (2008). ‘Not necessarily a bad thing …’: a study of online plagiarism amongst undergraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (5), 465–479.

Sharma, R. (2011). A step-by-step guide to students: How to avoid plagiarism. Journal of EducationResearch, 4 (2), 143–154.

Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning Theory or Pastime for the Self-Amused? Retrieved 20.02.2014., from: http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism_self-amused.htm

Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported Collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409-426.

Strijbos, J. W. (2004). The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, The Netherlands. Retrieved15.02.2014., from: http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/1032/1/Dissertation%20Strijbos%202004.pdf

Strijbos, J.W. (2011). Assessment of (Computer-Supported) Collaborative Learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 4 (1), 59–73.

Taylor, P. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom, In: Educational Studies in Mathematics 31, pp 151-173.

Дьюи Д. (1997). Психология и педагогика мышления. – М.: Совершенство. 235.стр.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol1.786

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.