Possibilities of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning in Blended-learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2012vol1.61Keywords:
blended learning, computer supported collaborative learning, higher education, participatory metaphorAbstract
Higher education institutions in Latvia offer blended learning where traditional face to face lectures are combined with e-learning options. Research on blended learning in Latvia is very little. Author offers her view on blended learning analysis in Latvia and possibility to introduce computer-supported collaborative learning as tool to involve students in more active learning and learners’ community building. As theoretical background author uses sociocultural theory and participatory metaphor. Article describes several very important issues to put attention on when starting to introduce CSCL and blended learning in Latvia’s higher education institutions.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Allen, Elaine & Seaman, Jeff. (2006). Making the grade: Online learning in the United States, Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://www.sloanc. org/publications/survey/survey06.asp.
2. Arnseth, Hans Christian, & Ludvigsen, Sten. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.167 185.
3. Bannon, Liam. (1989). Issues in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of NATO Advanced Workshop on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (Claire O’Malley, Editor) Retrieved from http://www.ul.ie/~idc/library/papersreports/LiamBannon/12/ LBMarat.html#NEWMAN1989.
4. Collis, Betty & Moonenb, Jef. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International Vol. 45, No. 2, June pp/ 93–106.
5. Diaz, Veronica & Strickland, Jennifer. (2009). Implementing blended learning. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI80077.pdf
6. Garrison, Randy, Kanuka, Heather (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 7 pp.95–105.
7. Garrison, Randy. & Vaughan, N. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines - John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1-30.
8. Graham, Charles. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
9. Jonassen, David, Davidson, Mark, Collins, Mauri, Campbell, John & Haag, Brenda Bannan. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), pp.7-23.
10. Mācīsimies sadarbojoties. (1998). R.: Mācību apgāds, 1998. pp. 129
11. Miyake, Naomi. (2007). Computer supported collaborative learning. In Andrews, R., Haythornthwaite, C.A (Eds.). The Sage handbook of e-learning research.SAGE, pp.248- 266.
12. Panitz, Ted (1996). A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning. Retrieved from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html
13. Rogers, Graham. (2004). History, learning technology and student achievement: Making the difference? Active Learning in Higher Education 5; pp.232.
14. Roschelle, Jeremy and Teasley, Stephanie D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'Malley, C.E., (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. (pp 69 97). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
15. Sfard, Anna. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), pp. 4-13.
16. Stacey, Elizabeth. (2005). A constructivist framework for online collaborative learning: Adult learning and collaborative learning theory. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning in higher education (pp. 140-161). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
17. Ulmane-Ozoliņa Lasma. (2011). Technology use for collaborative learning in blended learning. Problems of Education in 21st century. Volume 33, pp.83 – 91.
2. Arnseth, Hans Christian, & Ludvigsen, Sten. (2006). Approaching institutional contexts: Systemic versus dialogic research. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, pp.167 185.
3. Bannon, Liam. (1989). Issues in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Proceedings of NATO Advanced Workshop on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (Claire O’Malley, Editor) Retrieved from http://www.ul.ie/~idc/library/papersreports/LiamBannon/12/ LBMarat.html#NEWMAN1989.
4. Collis, Betty & Moonenb, Jef. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International Vol. 45, No. 2, June pp/ 93–106.
5. Diaz, Veronica & Strickland, Jennifer. (2009). Implementing blended learning. EDUCAUSE. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI80077.pdf
6. Garrison, Randy, Kanuka, Heather (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 7 pp.95–105.
7. Garrison, Randy. & Vaughan, N. (2007). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines - John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1-30.
8. Graham, Charles. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In Bonk, C. J. & Graham, C. R. (Eds.). Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
9. Jonassen, David, Davidson, Mark, Collins, Mauri, Campbell, John & Haag, Brenda Bannan. (1995). Constructivism and computer-mediated communication in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), pp.7-23.
10. Mācīsimies sadarbojoties. (1998). R.: Mācību apgāds, 1998. pp. 129
11. Miyake, Naomi. (2007). Computer supported collaborative learning. In Andrews, R., Haythornthwaite, C.A (Eds.). The Sage handbook of e-learning research.SAGE, pp.248- 266.
12. Panitz, Ted (1996). A Definition of Collaborative vs Cooperative Learning. Retrieved from http://www.city.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html
13. Rogers, Graham. (2004). History, learning technology and student achievement: Making the difference? Active Learning in Higher Education 5; pp.232.
14. Roschelle, Jeremy and Teasley, Stephanie D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In O'Malley, C.E., (ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. (pp 69 97). Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
15. Sfard, Anna. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), pp. 4-13.
16. Stacey, Elizabeth. (2005). A constructivist framework for online collaborative learning: Adult learning and collaborative learning theory. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning in higher education (pp. 140-161). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
17. Ulmane-Ozoliņa Lasma. (2011). Technology use for collaborative learning in blended learning. Problems of Education in 21st century. Volume 33, pp.83 – 91.
Downloads
Published
2015-05-09
Issue
Section
Higher Education Pedagogy
How to Cite
Ulmane-Ozoliņa, L. (2015). Possibilities of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning in Blended-learning. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 415-424. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2012vol1.61
