Project Work – a Challenge for Learner and Teacher

Elga Drelinga, Lolita Jonāne

Abstract


A topical issue in current sustainable education debate is seeking ways to support inquisitiveness, thinking skills and freedom of choice among learners as well as awaken their responsibility to pursue systematic and independent learning. Projects of various kinds are a plausible means for reaching such educational aims. Project work is essentially focused on achieving a specific result. It welcomes diversity, encourages meaningful learning and promotes comprehension of interconnections. This study explores project work in terms of the philosophical underpinnings of the teaching and learning process, investigates the opportunities of using project work in lower elementary school, appraises teachers’ positive experience and considers relevant solutions for pre-service teacher training and in-service professional development. The study suggests that strategic planning of teaching and learning, teaching and learning through cooperation, and evaluation of learning achievements are most fundamental aspects of project work. The study concludes by emphasising the key importance of creative interaction among the teacher, the learner and the society.

Keywords


constructivism; holism; planning of learning; project work; social and cognitive skills.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J. D., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.

Bruner, J.S. (1960). The Process of Education, New York: Random House.

Clark, Ed.T.Jr.(1997) Designing and Implementing an Integrated Curriculum. Holistic Education Press

Fišers, R. (2005). Mācīsim bērniem domāt. Rīga: RaKa.

Ģirupnieks J. (1931). Dabas zinību mācīšanas pamati, rakstu krājums red. Ģirupnieks J., Dabas mācības metodika. Metodiski norādījumi un materiāli dabas mācības pasniegšanai.Rīga: Valters un Rapa. 11-95. lpp. Kagawa, F. (2007). Dissonance in students' perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability:

McKeown, R. (2002). Toolkit economy education for sustainable development. Retrieved from http://www.esdtoolkit.org/

Lapiņa, I., Rudiņa V (1997). Interaktīvās mācīšanas metodes. – Rīga. Zvaigzne ABC.

Lieģeniece, D.(1999). Kopveseluma pieeja audzināšanā. R..: RaKa, 264 lpp.

Moore, J. (2005). Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 326- 339.

Obšteins, K.(1937). Pedagoģijas vēsture. Rīga: Ģenerālkomisija Latvijas Vidusskolas Skolotāju Kooperatīvā.

Implications for curriculum change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(3), 317-338.

Pappas, E. & Kander, R. G. (2008). Sustainable engineering design at James Madison University. Proceedings of 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. U.S.A., 38, 231-248.

Pappas, E.( 2012) A New Systems Approach to Sustainability: University Responsibility for Teaching Sustainability in Contexts, Journal of Sustainability Education Vol. 3

Piaget, J. (1970) Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child, New –York: Orion.

Rubana I. M. (2004).Mācīties darot. Interaktīvas mācības. – Rīga: RaKa.

Дьюи Дж. (2000). Демократия и образование. Москва: Педагогика –пресс

Выготский, Л.С.( 2000). Психология. Серия: Мир психологии. - Москва: ЭКСМО – Пресс.-1008с.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.530

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.