COOPERATIVE STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS IN INCLUSIVE ROBOTICS ACTIVITIES

Authors

  • Evaggelia Tsiomi Med in Special Education, Member of Scientific Team of Include (GR)
  • Andromachi Nanou Phd in Special Education, President and Research (GR)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.5147

Keywords:

inclusion, lego type robots, ASD children, cooperative strategies self regulated strategies

Abstract

A qualitative, action research study has been conducted to investigate cooperative learning strategies for children with ASD and typical development during educational robotic activities. The participants were 4 children, 2 with ASD and 2 with typical development, around the ages of 12-14. The sessions were held at “School for all: Tokei Maru” in Thessaloniki, once a week, for 3 months. Observation protocols, researcher's diary, and interviews were used for data collection. Children with ASD, although they had a strong motivation to participate in robotic activities, exhibited disruptive behaviors. The cooperative learning strategy was not effective. Self-regulation strategies have proven helpful in limiting the disrupting behaviors of children with ASD and in supporting cooperative learning.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: Author.

Ching-Ching, C., Pei-Li, H., & Kuo-Hung, H. (2013). Cooperative Learning in Lego Robotics Projects: Exploring the Impacts of Group Formation on Interaction and Achievement. Journal of networks, 8(7), 1529-1535.

Drosinou, M. (2009). Research and Religious Affairs by Ministry of Education. Retrieved from http://www.pischools.gr/download/lessons/drast_math_etoimotitas/vivlio_ekp/vivlio.pdf

Grey, I.M., Bruton, C., Honan, R., Mc Guinness, R., & Daly, M. (2007). Co-operative Learning for Children with an Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in Mainstream and Special Class Settings: An exploratory study. Educational Psychology in Practice, 23(4), 317-327.

Gray, C.L. (1998). Social Stories and Comic Strip Conversations with Students with Asperger Syndrome and High-Functioning Autism. In E.Schopler, G.B.Mesibov & L.J.Kunce (Eds.), Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism? (167-198). Boston: Springer.

Hinchliffe, K., Saggers, B., Chalmers, C., & Hobbs, J. (2016). Utilising robotics social clubs to support the needs of students on the autism spectrum within inclusive school settings. Autism CRC, Brisbane: QLD.

Leman, P. (2015). How Do Groups Work? Age Differences in Performance and the Social Outcomes of Peer Collaboration. Cognitive Science, 39, 804–820.

Lyman, Frank. (1987). Think-Pair-Share: An Expanding Teaching Technique. MAA-CIE Cooperative News 1.1, 1–2.

Magos, K., & Panagopoulou, P. (2008). I act by researching and I research by acting: an action research in teacher training. In the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Scientific Association of Adult Education: training and professional training of adult educators (CD – ROM).

McConnell, S.R. (2002). Interventions to facilitate social interaction for young children with autism: Review of available research and recommendations for educational intervention and future research. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 351–372.

McNiff, J. (1999). Action Research: Principles and Practices, London: Routledge.

Nanou, A., Chenine, I., & Oikonomou, A. (2019). Using Lego-type robots to teach social skills in non –formal inclusive environment: an action research study. 24th International Scientific Conference Educational Research and School Practice, Serbia.

Owens, G., Gordon, K., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2008). Treating autism spectrum conditions. In J. Trafton& W. Gordon (Eds.), Best practices in the behavioral management of health from precon- ception to adolescence (Vol. 3). Los Altos, CA: Institute for Brain Potential.

Reid, R., Mason, L., & Asaro-Saddler, K. (2013). Self-Regulation Strategies for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In S. Goldstei & J. A Naglieri (Eds), Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorders (257-281). New York: Springer.

Reynolds, S., Bendixen, R., Lawrence, T., & Lane, S. (2011). A Pilot Study Examining Activity Participation, Sensory Responsiveness, and Competence in Children with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal Autism Dev Disorder, 41, 1496–1506.

Rogers, S.J. (2000). Interventions that facilitate socialization in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(5), 399–409.

Volkmar, F.R., Paul, R., & Rogers, S.J. (2014). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed.). NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Wang, J., & Zhong, B. (2018). A preliminary study on switching roles in pair learning of robotics education. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops, 191–194.

Wehmeyer, M., Hughes, C., Agran, M., Garner, N. & Yeager, D. (2003). Student-directed learning strategies to promote the progress of students with intellectual disability in inclusive classrooms. Inclusive Education, 7(4), 415-428.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Tsiomi, E., & Nanou, A. (2020). COOPERATIVE STRATEGIES FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS IN INCLUSIVE ROBOTICS ACTIVITIES. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 4, 148-156. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.5147