Vyacheslav Kazarenkov, Bui Thuy, Tatyana Kazarenkova, Galina Kameneva


In educational science today, there are many studies on the factors associated with students' creativity using various research methods. A new feature of our current study is to use Q-methodology to explore the teacher's perspective on the factors influencing students' creativity in the teaching process. We investigated the views of 42 lecturers working at three universities in Vietnam including Hanoi National University of Education, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, National University of Civil Engineering. Results of Q-sort implementation of participants are processed using a special software dedicated to Q-methodology – Ken-Q Analysis version 1.0.6. The results of the study indicated that there are two factors affecting the development of the students' creativity. Factor 1 extracted was named as the psychological characteristics of the students themselves. Factor 1 with an eigenvalue of 22.79 accounted for 54% of the study variance and consisted of 23  lecturers defining for this factor. Factor 2 was named as characteristics of the teaching activity of teachers. It accounted for 8% of the study variance with an eigenvalue of 3.38 and contained 19 lecturers. These factors accounted for 62% of the total study variance. The results are considered as important suggestions for teachers and students to achieve the purpose of developing creative personalities. Moreover, this also is an instruction for educational managers to improve the quality of education at universities.



Creativity; factor; lecturer; Q-methodology; student

Full Text:



Banasick, S. (2019). Ken-Q Analysis (Version 1.0.6) [Software]. Available from doi:10.5281/zenodo.1300201

Brown, S.R. (1993). A primer on Q-methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91-138.

Hamed, P.K., Preece, A.S.D., & Hashim, C.N. (2016). Factors influencing creative teaching among teachers in Islamic private schools in Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from:

Habibollah, N., Rohani, A., Tengku, Aizan, H., Sharir, J., & Kumar, V. (2010). Relationship between creativity and academic achievement: A study of gender differences. Journal of American, 6, 181-190.

Hong, J.-C., Horng, J.-S., Lin, L.-J., Chang, S.-H., Chu, H.-C., Lin, C.-L. (2009). A Study of Influential Factors for Creative Teaching online: 15 February.

Kazarenkov V.I. (2011). Tvorchestvo pedagoga kak sistema. Sistemnaja psihologija i sociologija, 3, 109-114.

Mokry, S. & Dufek, O. (2014). Q method and its use for segmentation in tourism. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 445-452.

Ramankulov, S., Usembayeva, I., Berdi, D., Omarov, B., Baimukhanbetov, B., & Shektibayev, N. (2016). Formation of the Creativity of Students in the Context of the Education Informatization. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(16), 9598-9613.

Richardson, C. & Mishra, P. (2018). Learning Environments that Support Student Creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54.

Sadeghi, A. & Ofoghi, N. (2011). The psychological factors affecting students' creativity inside the class (CIC) (case study the University of Guilan, Iran). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 263–270.

Shrivastava, S. (2016). Creativity and intelligence. International Journal of Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 339-1344.

Tamannaeifar, M.R., & Motaghedifard, M. (2014). Subjective well-being and its sub-scales among students: The study of role of creativity and self-efficacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 37–42. DOI:

Tiernon, P., Hensel, D., & Roy-Ehri, L. (2017). Using Q methodology in quality improvement projects. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 0(0), 1-8

Wechsler, S.M., Vendramini, C.M.M., & Oakland, T. (2012). Thinking and creative styles: A validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 235–242. DOI: .



  • There are currently no refbacks.