ASPECTS OF INEQUALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF EMPLOYMENT OF PRE-SCHOOL TEACHERS IN LATVIA

Authors

  • Inga Vanaga University of Latvia (LV)
  • Anda Grīnfelde Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvian Trade Union of Education and Science Employees (LV)
  • Līga Paula Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.5132

Keywords:

Actor network theory, inequality, interaction, pre-school teachers, salary, teacher workload

Abstract

Policy-making in education involves social agents at national, municipal and institutional levels. National regulations and financial capacity of municipalities determine working conditions of teachers and employment aspects at all levels of the education system. For several years, discussions have been taking place in Latvia involving employers of education sector and policy makers on tackling inequalities in pay and workload principles for pre-school teachers. Situation of the pre-school teachers varies across municipalities and is affected by their financial opportunities to sustain educational institutions and ensure teachers’ salaries. In 2019, Latvian Trade Union of Education and Science Employees conducted a survey of all 119 municipalities in order to identify inequalities in the context of the pre-school teachers’ employment. Actor network theory was used to examine links and interactions between actors in education policy, thus addressing inequalities in pre-school education. According to the survey, workload of the pre-school teachers is being reduced in order to meet the requirements of the regulatory framework regarding the minimum monthly wage of the teachers. Higher wages the teachers receive in Pieriga region, which is comparatively wealthier than other regions of Latvia. In order to ensure equal pay for all pre-school teachers in all municipalities, it is necessary to ensure financing from the state budget.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). The key to success in innovation. Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 207-225.

Bechter, B., Brandl, B., & Prosser, T. (2017). Engagement in European Social Dialogue: An investigation into the role of social partner structural capacity. Industrial Relations Journal, 48(4), 365–382.

Bruun, H., & Hukkinen, J. (2003). Crossing boundaries: An integrative framework for studying technological change. Social Studies of Science, 33(1), 95-116.

Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & A.V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology. Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277-303). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hugues, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 83-103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Centrālā statistikas pārvalde. (2020). Darba samaksa. Pieejams https://www.csb.gov.lv/lv/statistika/statistikas-temas/socialie-procesi/darba-samaksa

Chesterman, A. (2006). Questions in the sociology of translation. In J. F. Duarte, A. Rose, & T. Seruya (Eds.), Translation studies at the interface of disciplines (pp. 9-27). Amsterdam, NLD: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Izglītības likums. (1998). Pieejams https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=50759

Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social Network Analysis. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Latour, B. (1997). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/P-67%20ACTOR-NETWORK.pdf

Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. P. Hugues, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2009). Social Network Analysis. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa4d/5f9ae3fbe6ae16a1de02f7b6daddf615a238.pdf

Nevienlīdzības novēršana. (2016). Eiropas pusgada tematiskā faktu lapa. Pieejams https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/european-semester_thematic factsheet_addressing-inequalities_lv.pdf

Noteikumi par darbiem, kas saistīti ar iespējamu risku citu cilvēku veselībai, un obligāto veselības pārbaužu veikšanas kārtība Nr. 477. (2018) Pieejams https://likumi.lv/ta/id/300636-noteikumi-par-darbiem-kas-saistiti-ar-iespejamu-risku-citu-cilveku-veselibai-un-obligato-veselibas-parbauzu-veiksanas-kartiba

Noteikumi par pedagogiem nepieciešamo izglītību un profesionālo kvalifikāciju un pedagogu profesionālās kompetences pilnveides kārtību Nr. 569. (2018). Pieejams https://likumi.lv/ta/id/301572-noteikumi-par-pedagogiem-nepieciesamo-izglitibu-un-profesionalo-kvalifikaciju-un-pedagogu-profesionalas-kompetences-pilnveides

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2019_f8d7880d-en

Pedagogu darba samaksas noteikumi Nr. 445. (2016). Pieejams https://likumi.lv/ta/id/283667-pedagogu-darba-samaksas-noteikumi

Stacenko, S. (2014). Arodbiedrību loma sociālajā partnerībā publiskās pārvaldes lēmumu pieņemšanā (Doktora disertācija). Pieejams https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/4945

Šūmane, S. (2010). Lauku inivācija: jaunu attīstības prakšu veidošana. Bioloģiskās lauksaimniecības piemērs. (Doktora disertācija). Pieejams https://www.szf.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/szf_faili/Petnieciba/promocijas_darbi/Sumane_Sandra_2010.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Vanaga, I., Grīnfelde, A., & Paula, L. (2020). ASPECTS OF INEQUALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF EMPLOYMENT OF PRE-SCHOOL TEACHERS IN LATVIA. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 754-764. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.5132