THE USE OF BOOKS IN CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL)

Authors

  • Veronika Bezilova Institute of British and American Studies, Faculty of Arts, University of Prešov (SK)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4927

Keywords:

book, content, language, your body

Abstract

Connection between language and content in school environment is important, especially when we teach our students to be independent language users. The present paper investigates the connection between language and content goals. Research sample consisted of 10 and 11 years old primary school students (N = 12, M=1, F=11). The research was focused on the book Your Body, where vocabulary connected to body was being taught. New vocabulary was presented in the context, afterwards, new vocabulary and phrases were being thought through the mind maps. The case study approach was used to get an in-depth analysis of the research problem. The main aim of the research was to connect language and content, where the main emphasis was put on the content. The paper answers the research question focused on the role of the books in language and content integrated learning. The results of the research show that books are a great connection between language and content goals and can be used in content and language integrated learning.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press

Craen P., Mondt, K., Allain, L., & Gao, Y. (2007). Why and How CLIL Works. An Outline for a CLIL Theory. CLIL Special Issue, 16(3), 70-78.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content and Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.

Gondová, D. (2013). CLIL – integrované vyučovanie obsahu a jazyka. Žilina: EDIS – vydavateľstvo Žilinskej univerzity.

Lukáčová, Z. (2017). On the nature of the implementation steps towards blended learning in teacher training programmes. CLEaR2017 conference proceedings, 23-38.

Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE: The European dimension: actions, trends and foresight potential. Jyväskylä: UniCOM.

Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan

Pavelová, B. (2016). On communication, social roles, register and teaching. English Matters, 7, 93-103.

Sepešiová, M. (2015). Materials in CLIL classes. CLE2015 conference proceedings. Retrieved from: https://www.slovakedu.com/publications/llce2015-conference-proceedings/a20/

Straková, Z. (2011). Integrating Art into Teaching English at a Primary Level: A Case Study. In A. Kačmárová (Ed.), English Matters II. (75-81). Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove.

Straková, Z. (2013). Introduction to Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej Univerzity.

Suwannoppharat, K. & Chinokul, S. (2015). Applying CLIL to English Language Teaching in Thailand: Issues and Challenges. LACLIL, 8(2), 237-254.

Urmeneta, C.E. (2019). An Introduction to Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) for Teachers and Teacher Educators. CLIL Journal of innovation and research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 7-9. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.21.

Xanthou, M. (2011). The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 116-126.

Cimermanová, I. (2017). CLIL – a Dialogue between the Language and Subject Teacher. Scientia Et Eruditio, 1, 1-14.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Bezilova, V. (2020). THE USE OF BOOKS IN CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING (CLIL). SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4927