Mykola Pantiuk, Iryna Sadova, Svitlana Lozynska


An essential characteristic of pedagogical activity is its conflict potential. Such specific features as high social and normative expectations and significant overloading of roles in combination with individual psychological characteristics of teacher's personality lead to the emergence or exacerbation of various intrapersonal conflicts. Unsettled conflict usually becomes a constant source of discontent with yourself and the environment, causes a high level of anxiety, starts devastating processes of emotional burnout. Therefore, it is important to provide timely assistance to teachers in situations of intrapersonal conflicts.

The purpose of the article is to highlight the results of empirical identification of intrapersonal conflict factors of primary school teachers. To achieve this goal it is necessary to solve the following tasks: 1) to investigate the factors of teachers conflict behaviour at the empirical level; 2) to determine the specifics and nature of the relationship between the level and characteristics of conflict and creativity, between the motivation of achievement and development of subjective qualities of a primary school teacher.

Research tools: adapted methods of K.Thomas (N.Hrishyna) on the diagnosis of the style of behaviour in a conflict situation; methods of diagnosis of personality motivation for success (T.Ehlers); methods of studying frustration reactions (S.Rosenzweig); methods of diagnostics of interpersonal relations (L.Sobchyk); A.Rukavyshnikov’s methods for the definition of mental burnout; Drawing Apperceptive Test (DAT); methods of self-actualization A.Maslow adapted by Gozman, Kroz & Latinskaya. The total number of respondents - 32 primary school teachers of secondary schools in Drohobych, Lviv region.

The analysis of the obtained results showed that: 1) there are specific characteristic connections between the level and features of conflict, creativity, between the motivation of achievement and development of subjective qualities of a person; 2) internal conflict as an interpersonal phenomenon is both a personal characteristic and a determinant of social interaction. It has been found that rivalry, low verbal creativity, lack of communicative competence in combination with extrapunitive type of reactions cause increased conflict. According to the results of the researches, a significant number of primary school teachers under study (32%) have increased intrapersonal conflict. Of course, this alarming indicator prevents the establishment of optimal pedagogical communication and provokes conflict among children of primary school age.



intrapersonal conflict; primary school teacher; motivation; mental burnout; self-actualization

Full Text:



Archambault, I., Kurdi, V., Olivier, E., & Goulet, M. (2016). The joint effect of peer victimization and conflict with teachers on student engagement at the end of elementary school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 62(2), 207-232. DOI: 10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.2.0207

Colnerud, G. (2015). Moral stress in teaching practice. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 21 (3), 346-360. DOI:

Coser, L. (1968). The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge&Paul.

Deutsch, M. (2006). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Gerlach, R. & Gockel, C. (2018). We belong together: belonging to the principal’s ingroup protects teachers from the negative effects of task conflict on psychological safety. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 302. DOI:

Geerlings J., Thijs J., & Verkuyten M. (2018). Teaching in ethnically diverse classrooms: Examining individual differences in teacher self-efficacy. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 134–47. DOI: https://

Maxwell, S., Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., & Bromhead, D. (2017). The impact of school climate and school identification on academic achievement: multilevel modeling with student and teacher data. Front. Psychol. 8:2069. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02069

McGrath, KF & Bergen, PV (2017). Adding Color to Conflict: Disruptive Students' Drawings of Themselves with Their Teachers. The elementary school journal Volume, 117 (4), 642-663. DOI:

Анцупов, А. (2003). Профилактика конфликтов в школьном коллективе. Москва: ВЛАДОС.

Ахмеджанов, Э. (1997). Психологические тесты. Москва: Лимт.

Балл, Г. (2003). Сучасний гуманізм і освіта. Рівне: Ліста-М.

Басова, Н. (2000). Педагогика и практическая психология. Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс.

Божович, Л. (2000). Личность и ее формирование в детском возрасте. Психология личности: хрестоматия. Самара: БАХРАХ.

Гришина, Н. (2008). Психология конфликта. Санкт-Петербург: Питер.

Гозман, Л., Кроз, М., & Латинская М. (1995). Самоактуализационный тест. Москва: Российское педагогическое агентство.

Давыдов, В.(1996). Теория развивающего обучения. Москва: ИНТОР.

Ішмуратов, А. (1996). Конфлікт і згода. Основи когнітивної теорії конфліктів. Київ: Наукова думка.

Карамушка, Л., & Дзюба, Т. (2009). Психологія управління конфліктами в організації (на матеріалі діяльності освітніх організацій). Київ: Наук. світ.

Карелин, А. (ред.). (2000). Психологические тесты В 2 т. Москва: ВЛАДОС.

Маслоу, А. (1999). Новые рубежи человеческой природы / Пер. с англ. Москва: Смысл.

Мілютіна, К. (2004). Теорія та практика психологічного тренінгу. Київ: МАУП.

Морено, Я. (2001). Психодрама . Москва: Апрель Пресс: ЭКСМО-Пресс.

Пірен, М. (2001). Деонтологія конфліктів та управління : Київ: УАДУ.

Райгородский, Д. (2000). Практическая психодиагностика. Методики и тесты. Самара «БАХРАХ - М».

Рыбакова, М. (1991). Конфликт и взаимодействие в педагогическом процессе: кн. для учителя. Москва: Просвещение.

Самоукина, Н. (2000). «Игры, в которые играют…»: психологический практикум. Дубна: Феникс.

Собчик, Л. (2003). Психология индивидуальности. Теория и практика психодиагностики. Санкт-Петербург: Издательство «Речь».

Титаренко, Т. (2003) Життєвий світ особистості: у межах і за межами буденності. Київ: Либідь.

Фетискин, Н., Козлов, Г., & Мануйлов. (2002). Социально-психологическая диагностика развития личности и малых групп. Москва: Издательство Института Психотерапии.



  • There are currently no refbacks.