FUTURE EDUCATORS’ LEARNING TRENDS AT THE UNIVERSITY: HOW IMPORTANT AND SIGNIFICANT THE LEARNER’S EXPERIENCE IS?

Authors

  • Remigijus Bubnys Siauliai University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3855

Keywords:

future educator, learning, university, the learner, experience

Abstract

The structure and content of studies at a higher education institution, educating specialists in the field of education studies, are more oriented to subject-centred rather than pedagogical preparation; insufficient attention is paid to students’ practical training, where through self-reflection and reflection students’ sensations turn into experience. The problematicity lies in the fact that often students’ practical experience is limited only to technical skills applied in concrete situations; the basis is mechanical learning, when the focus is on theoretical knowledge gained at the university, which is not integrated with the students’ experience outlived earlier or during practice. On the other hand, theoretical knowledge is often not related to the practical activity. The results of the quantitative research disclose future educators’ teaching and learning trends at the university by analyzing, assessing and linking learners’ outlived experience with a specific learning context.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Remigijus Bubnys, Siauliai University
    Siauliai university, Lithuania

References

Benade, L. (2015). Teachers’ critical reflective practice in the context of twenty-first century learning. Open Review of Educational Research, 2(1), 42–54.

Brookfield, S. (2005). The Power of Critical Theory for Adult Learning and Teaching. Open University Press.

Bruno, A., & Dell’Aversana, G. (2018). Reflective Practicum in Higher Education: The Influence of the Learning Environment on the Quality of Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 345–358.

Clegg, S. (2000). Knowing through reflective practice in higher education. Educational Action Research, 8(3), 451–469.

Colomer, J., Pallisera, M., Fullana, J., Burriel, M.P., & Fernández, R. (2013). Reflective Learning in Higher Education: A Comparative Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 364–370.

Conway, P. F. (2001). Anticipatory Reflection while Learning to Teach: From a Temporally Truncated to a Temporally Distributed Model of Reflection in Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 89–106.

Eurydice (2015). The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions and Policies, Brussels: EACEA.

Eurydice (2018). Teaching Careers in Europe: Access, Progression and Support. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.

Eurydice. (2015). The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://www.anefore.lu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/EURYDICE-THE-TEACHING-PROFESSION.pdf

European Commission (2015). Shaping Career-long Perspectives on Teaching. A Quide on Policies to Improve Initial Teacher Education, ET2020 Working Group on Schools Policy (2014/15), Brussels.

Griffiths, V. (2000). The Reflective Dimension in Teacher Education. International Journal of Educational Research, 33(5), 539–555.

Hixon, E., & So, H. J. (2009). Technology's Role in Field Experiences for Preservice Teacher Training. Educational Technology & Society, 12 (4), 294–304.

Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming Teacher Practice: Becoming the Critically Reflective Teacher. Reflective Practice, 1, 293–307.

Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative Learning as Discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58–63.

Naylor, D. A., Campbell-Evans, G., & Maloney, C. (2015). Learning to Teach: What Do Pre-service Teachers Report. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (11). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n11.7

Nicholls, G. (2001). Professional Development in Higher Education. New Dimensions and Directions. London: Kogan Page.

Pedagogų rengimo pertvarka, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.smm.lt/web/lt/pedagogu-rengimo-pertvarka [in Lithuanian language]

Pedagogų rengimo reglamentas, 2018. Retrieved from http://www.smm.lt/uploads/documents/Pedagogams/PRR%202018-05-29%20%20patvirtintas.pdf [in Lithuanian language]

Salter, P., Hill, A., Navin, F., & Knight, C. (2013). Wider Professional Experiences: The Value of Pre-service Teachers Learning in Wider Contexts. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(12). Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol38/iss12/7

Schmidt, M. (2010). Learning From Teaching Experience: Dewey’s Theory and Preservice Teachers’ Learning. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 131–146.

Simoncini, K. M., Lasen, M., & Rocco, S. (2014). Professional Dialogue, Reflective Practice and Teacher Research: Engaging Early Childhood Pre-Service Teachers in Collegial Dialogue about Curriculum Innovation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.3

Teacher Education around the World. Changing policies and practices (2012). Edited by Linda Darling-Hammond and Ann Lieberman. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

UNESCO (2017). Education Transforms Lives. Paris. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002472/247234e.pdf

UNESCO, 2016. Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action. Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all. Paris. Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/incheon-framework-for-action-en.pdf

Walkington, J. (2005). Becoming a teacher: Encouraging development of teacher identity through reflective practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 53–64.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-21

How to Cite

Bubnys, R. (2019). FUTURE EDUCATORS’ LEARNING TRENDS AT THE UNIVERSITY: HOW IMPORTANT AND SIGNIFICANT THE LEARNER’S EXPERIENCE IS?. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3855