STUDY PROGRAM SELECTION FACTORS: ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SENSITIVE PROFESSIONS

Authors

  • Egidijus Nedzinskas Lithuania Business University (LT)
  • Rūta Nedzinskienė Kaunas University of Technology (LT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3845

Keywords:

Police Officers, Social Educators, Social Sensitive Professions

Abstract

Nowadays situation requires professionals, who are open-minded, flexible, sensitive to other people and the environment, tolerant, able to establish contacts, and to improve these competences. This can be expressed by socially sensitive and attentive, ethically and responsibly behaving professionals. Thus, the selection of study programs of police officers and social educators as representatives of social sensitive professions is becoming critical important. This leads to the aim of this research: to analyse the study program selection factors of social sensitive professions. The research was based on systematic and comparative scientific literature analysis and statistical data analysis. The study was conducted in 2015 in two Lithuanian universities, where future police officers and future social educators are educated. 109 recipients of the study program “Law and Police Activities” and 40 students of the study program “Social pedagogics” have participated in the survey. Performed analysis has indicated the following main reasons determining students joining to the study program “Law and Police Activities”: the desire to serve and help people (71%), good employment opportunities (52%), the chance to reveal their best features (44%), the desire to acquire the status of a police officer (39%). The respondents of “Social pedagogics” study program revealed their desire to gain the status of a social educator (56%), to serve and help people (51%) and to reveal their best features (36%) as the most important reasons for the selection of this study program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bitinas, b. (2004). Hodegetika: auklėjimo teorija ir technologija. Vilnius: Kronta.

Chatthong, C., Kovitaya, M., & Kongjaroen, M. (2014). The Elements of a Learning Model to Enhance Service Mind of Thai Police Officer. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 880-888.

Chechak, D. (2015). Professional Dissonance as a Predictor of Job Dissatisfaction and Psychological Distress among Social Work Professionals: A Cumulative Risk Model. St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador.

Cox, C., & Kirby, S. (2018). Can higher education reduce the negative consequences of police occupational culture amongst new recruits? Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 41 Issue: 5, 550-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-10-2016-0154

Crowe, A. R., Mooney, E., & Hawley, T. S. (2018). Preservice teachers’ visions of themselves: powerful teachers or powerful social studies teachers? Social Studies Research and Practice, Vol. 13 Issue 1, 113-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-03-2017-0011

Eliot, M., & Turns, J. (2011). Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professional identity development for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 630-654.

Frost, N. (2017). From “silo” to “network” profession – a multi-professional future for social work. Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 12, Issue 2/3, 174-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-05-2017-0019

Forrester, D. (2017). Outcomes in Children’s Social Care. Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 12, Issue: 2/3, 144-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-08-2017-0036

Garnienė, D. (2006). Bendrojo lavinimo mokyklos ugdymo karjerai modelis: Parametrai ir realizavimo principai: Doctoral dissertation: Social sciences, Education (07S). Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto leidykla.

Girard, N. (2015). Knowledge at the boundary between science and society: a review of the use of farmers’ knowledge in agricultural development. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2015-0049

Holland, J. L. (1973). Making Vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood cliffs, NJ.

Jovaiša, L. (2011). Edukologija, I tomas. Vilnius: Agora.

Jurevičiūtė, K. (2004). Akademinio jaunimo profesinis pašaukimas: realusis ir idealusis modelis. Acta pedagogica Vilnensia, 13, 72-80.

Kalantari, S., Mirshekari, L., Kerami, A., Vahed, A. S., Salehi, A., Momeni, H., Seraji, A., & Faraji, M. (2014). A study on the ethical components of nursing practice (moral distress, ethical sensitivity, ethical decision). Middle – East Journal of Scientific Research, 19(6). 740-746.

Kohlström, K., Rantatalo, O., Karp, S., & Padyab, M. (2017). Policy ideals for a reformed education: How police students value new and enduring content in a time of change. Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol. 29, Issue 7/8, 524-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2016-0082

Korbeck, J. (2002). Reflections on the Exportability of Social Pedagogy and its Possible Limits. Social work in Europe, 37-49.

Leliūgienė, I. (2002). Socialinė pedagogika. Kaunas: Technologija, 427.

Lileikis, S. (2007). Jaunuolių altruizmo ugdymas: sociokultūrinis kontekstas: asmenybės socializacijos perspektyva. Klaipėda: Klaipėdos universiteto leidykla.

Misiūnas, E. (2010). Policijos pareigūnų teisinis statusas. Doctoral dissertation. Social sciences, Law (01 S). Vilnius: MRU.

Mohamed, Al-E., M., Donkers, J. Wajid, G. & Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2014). A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: The Four-Gates model. Medical Teacher. Apr2014 Supplement, 36(9).

Nedzinskas, E., & Nedzinskienė, R. (2017). Medical professional as the social sensitive group: analysis of responsibility. Medical Physics in the Baltic States 2017. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Medical Physics, 81-84.

Nedzinskienė, R., & Nedzinskas, E. (2018). Evaluation of Legal and Social Responsibility: the Case of Future Police Officers. Society. Integration. Education. International Scientific Conference. May 25th-26th. Rezekne Academy of Technologies. Rezekne, Latvia, 185-195.

Ogowewo, B. O. (2010). Factors influencing career choice among secondary school students: Implications for career guidance. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(2), 451.

Owie, I. (2003). Teaching, apriori or aposteriori decision: A preliminary analysis of effective impact. African Journal of Studies in Education, 1, 21-29.

Pukelis, K. (2004). Mokytojų rengimo idealinio modelio parametrai. Kaunas: VDU leidykla.

Rosenbaum, D. P., & McCarty, W. P. (2017). Organizational justice and officer “buy in” in American policing. Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 40, Issue: 1, 71-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2016-0114

Scott, D. (2014). Academic and Professional Knowledge in the Professional Doctorate. DOI: 10.1108/S1479-362820140000013000.

Smalskys, V. (2008). Policijos personalo rengimo šiuolaikinės kryptys. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, 23, 88-97.

Spencer, K. B., Charbonneau, A. K., & Glaser, J. (2016). Implicit Bias and Policing. Social & Personality Psychology Compass. Jan2016, 10(1) 50-63.

Stanišauskienė, V. (2000). Rengimosi karjerai proceso socioedukaciniai pagrindai ir jo prielaidos Lietuvos bendrojo lavinimo mokykloje. Doctoral dissertation. Social sciences (07S). Kaunas: KTU.

Šlapkauskas, V. (2008). Globalios rinkos iššūkiai rengiant teisininkus. Jurisprudencija, 10(112), 23-31.

Teresevičienė, M. (1997). Grupės nuolatinio mokymosi sistemoje: mokymosi mažose grupėse principai. Nuolatinis mokymasis besikeičiančioje visuomenėje: prielaidos ir prieštaravimai. Kaunas: VDU.

Tidikis, R. (2003). Socialinių mokslų tyrimų metodologija. Vilnius: LTU leidybos centras.

Vaitkevičius, J. (1995). Socialinės pedagogikos pagrindai. Vilnius: Egalda.

Vila, B., James, S., & James, L. (2018). How police officers perform in encounters with the public: Measuring what matters at the individual level, Policing: An International Journal, Vol. 41, Issue 2, 215-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2016-0166

Walker, J., & Crawford, K. (2014). Social Work and Human Development. London: Sage/Learning Matters.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-21

How to Cite

Nedzinskas, E., & Nedzinskienė, R. (2019). STUDY PROGRAM SELECTION FACTORS: ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SENSITIVE PROFESSIONS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 396-405. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol1.3845