LATGALE INHABITANTS’ SATISFACTION WITH THE STATE IN CONTEXT OF THEIR FEELING OF HAPPINESS

Ēriks Kalvāns

Abstract


The aim of this scientific research article is to describe the satisfaction with state of Latgale inhabitants’, as well as illustrate how this factor interacts with their feeling of happiness.

A number of studies confirmed the link between happiness and the socio-economic conditions in the state. The low standard of living of Latgale’s inhabitants resulted in a fast decline of the number of inhabitants in the region. The unemployment rate in Latgale is the largest rate of unemployment in Latvia. Because of this problem of satisfaction with the state is very topical in this region.

The theoretical interpretation of the happiness phenomenon is based on the findings of positive psychology, according to which happiness is defined as a life satisfaction and positive evaluation of his life and positive emotions over negative emotions.

The author developed methodology „Family, Job, State” and "Oxford happiness questionnaire" adapted by the author to Latvian culture and socio-demographic survey, were used in the research paper.

It was found out that Latgale inhabitants are not satisfied with the state socio-economic situation, state influence on personality, also the emotional attitude towards the state is at a low level.

Keywords


feeling of happiness; satisfaction with the state; emotional attitude towards the state; attitude towards the state socio-economic conditions; state influence on personality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adler, N. E., & Newman, K. (2002). Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affairs, 21 (2), 60-76.

Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America's perception of life quality. NY: Plenum Press.

Argyle, M. (2003). Causes and Correlates of Happiness, In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.).Well being: The foundations of hedonic psychology,353-373.

Clark, A., Oswald, A.J. (1994). Unhappiness and Unemployment. The Economic Journal,104,648-659.

Diener, E., Biswas-Diener, R. (2002) Will money increase subjective well-being? A review and guide to needed literature. Social Indicators Research 57, 119 – 169.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., Lucas, R.E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403- 425.

Diener, E., Seligman, M. (2004). Beyond Money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1-31.

Galati, D., & Sotgiu, I. (2004). Happiness and Positive Emotions. In: A. Delle Fave (Ed.). Positive Psychology. Special issue of Ricerche di Psicologia 1, 41-62.

Hills, P., Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford happiness questionnaire: a compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences 33, 1073–1082.

Kahneman, D., Diener, E., Schwarz, N. (2003). Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. Russell Sage Foundation Publications.

Kalvāns, Ē. (2013). Latgales iedzīvotāju laimes izjūtas struktūra un psiholoģiskās labklājības saturs. Promocijas darbs. Daugavpils.

Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 2, 111-131.

Nye, J. (2003). The Power of Persuasion: Dual Components of US Leadership. The Conversation with J. Nye. Harvard International Review.

Snyder,C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.). (2009). Oxford handbook of positive psychology, 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stevenson, B., Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing he Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 1-87.

Svence, G. (2009). Pozitīvā psiholoģija. Apgāds Zvaigzne ABC.

Valsts Nodarbinātības aģentūras dati. (2016). http://www.nva.gov.lv/

Wendt, A. (1994). Collective Identity Formation and the International State. American Political Science Review. N 88.

Воронов, В.В., Лавриненко, О.Я. (2011). Доходы населения Латвии: уровень, дифференциация, динамика. Социологические исследования, 9, c. 47.

Евфремова, Ж.Д. (2001). Образ государства и власти в контексте русской ментальности. „Национальная идея как фактор обеспечения социально-политической и экономической стабильности российского общества": Материалы международной научно-практической конференции. Под ред. А.Л. Елисеева. Орёл: Орёл ГТУ, c. 337-344.

Киселев, И. Ю. (2003). Образ государства в международных отношениях и социальное познание. Вопросы философии, № 5.

Киселев. И. Ю., Смирнова, А. Г. (2006). Динамика образа государства в международных отношениях .СПб.

Козбаненко, В.А. (2002). Государственное управление: основы теории и организации. Учебник. В 2 т. Изд. 2-е. М: „Статут”.

Оксфордский толковый словарь по психологии. (2002). Под ред. А.Ребера. M., 467 с.Черданцев, А.Ф. (2000). Теория государства и права: Учебник для вузов. М.: Юрайт, 432 с.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol1.2416

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.