THE FOCUS OF SIGNIFICANT LEARNING: THE PEDAGOGICAL POTENCIAL OF DEBATING

Authors

  • Maija Ročāne Liepaja Secondary School No.15 (LV)
  • Alīda Samuseviča Liepaja University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/ercs2014.1131

Keywords:

debating, motivation, teaching potential, self-discipline, significant learning, students

Abstract

Nowadays, in the process of the implementation of student-centered learning paradigm, not only the knowledge, skills and attitude formation has been updated, but a new quality of teaching and learning as well. Thus significant learning approach has been promoted, leading to the each student's personal development and providing new resources and opportunities. The publication describes the productive dimension of significant learning in the English language learning process revealing the educational opportunities and a potential of the innovative learning method – debating. The prerequisites of significant learning for students have been analyzed as well as the possibilities to develop learning skills through students engaging in the process of debating. Empirical research data confirms the value of the learning method – debating: it promotes self-discipline, the increase of interest in learning, student responsibility as well as raising students‟ motivation

References

Barr, R., Tagg, J. (1995). In Change. Vol.27, No. November/December Reid Educational Foundation. Published by Heldref Publications. Washington, 13-25. pp.

Brackenbury, T. (2012). A qualitative examination of connections between learnercentered teaching and past significant learning experiences. The Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Vol. 12, No. 4. 12 – 28. pp.

Dolence, M.G., Norris, D.M. (1995). Transforming Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the 21st Century. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning. 76 – 77. pp.

Eiropas Padome. Valodas politikas nodaļa. Eiropas kopīgās pamatnostādnes valodu apguvei: mācīšanās, mācīšana, vērtēšana. Rīga : Madonas poligrāfs, 2006.

Čehlova, Z. (2002). Izziņas aktivitāte mācībās. Rīga : RaKa.

Fink, L.D. (2013). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. John Wiley & Sons Jossey Bass. San Francisko.

Jonāne, L. (2011). Mūsdienīga mācību procesa organizēšana. Eiropas Sociāla fonda finansētā projekta „Profesionālajā izglītībā iesaistīto vispārizglītojošo mācību priekšmetu pedagogu kompetences paaugstināšana‖ materiāls. Latvijas Universitāte. Rīga.

Kursīte, R. (2008). Vispārējās vidējās izglītības mācību priekšmeta programmas paraugs– angļu valoda. Rīga: Izglītības satura un eksaminācijas centrs.

Maļicka, J. ( 2004). Piederības izjūta un mācību motivācija. Rīga : RaKa.

Rogers, K. (1961). On becoming a person. Western Behavioral Sciences Institute. Boston.

Sardiko, L. (2007). Mācīšanās motivācija svešvalodu stundās. Skolotājs, 2(62), 2007. 29. – 33. lpp

Tiļļa, I. (2005). Sociālkultūras mācīšanās organizācijas sistēma. Rīga : RaKa.

Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Jossey- Bass/Wiley. San Francisko.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles