THE ETHNOLINGUISTIC SITUATION IN INDRA MUNICIPALITY IN THE RURAL PART OF KRĀSLAVA REGION

Authors

  • Antra Kļavinska Mag. philol., PhD student at the University of Latvia, linguist. Lecturer in the Department of Philology at Rezekne Academy of Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/latg2008.1.1591

Keywords:

.

Abstract

The research is based on the processed questionnaire data gathered during the ethnolinguistic expedition to Indra municipality in the rural part of the region of Kraslava in June, 2007 (120 respondents). The paper analyzes the answers of the respondents regarding the ethnic self-identification of the people, their knowledge of languages, the dominance of languages,, and their functions in the micro and macro environments of Indra municipality. The most important conclusions are: There is a noticeable difference between the official statistical data and the notions of ethnic belonging of the respondents: the official statistics state that the dominant ethnic group in Indra municipality are Belorussians; however, the major part of respondents consider themselves to be Russians. The Russian language dominates in verbal and written communication in both the micro and the macro environment. Many respondents admit that they speak „their own” language in the municipality - Russian with lexical, morphological and phonetical elements of Belorussian and Polish. The role of the Latgalian language in the rural municipality is not important; the respondents do not see any perspectives for its use in the future. The Latvian language as the official language is respected in the administration of the municipality; however, there is a wish to recognize both Latvian and Russian as official languages. The roles of the school (for the acquisition of the Latvian language) and of the Church (the language of praying is Polish, but masses are held in Russian and Latgalian) are important for the formation of the linguistic scenery of Indra municipality. In the polyethnic and multilingual environment of Indra municipality, there is a predominantly tolerant attitude towards different languages and ethnic groups.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Clyne, Michael (2007). Multilingualism. The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Ed. Coulmas F. Oxford, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers. 301–313.

Fishman, Joshua Aaron (2007). Language and ethnicity: The View from Within. The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Ed. Coulmas F. Oxford, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers. 327–341.

Garšva, Kazimieras (2004). Latvijos lietuviai: jų istorija, šneketos, telkiniai, kultūra. (Puslapis parengtas pagal informaciją, skelbiamą žurnale Žiemgala. Nr. 2. http://www.baltu.lt/Kalbos/liet_kalb_telk.htm#Latgalos%20lietuviai

Indras pagasts. 2008. http://www.kraslavasrajons.lv/index.php?id=44

Jankovjaks, Miroslavs (2007). Krāslavas rajonu apdzīvojošo baltkrievu minoritāšu daudzvalodība. Valodas funkcionēšanas sfēras. Linguistica Lettica. 2007. Nr. 16. Rīga: LU Latviešu valodas institūts. 193–211.

Malmkjær, Kristen (ed.). (2004). The Lingusitics Encyclopedia. London, New York: Routledge. 64–75.

Герд, Александр (2005). Полиэтничность и билингвизм как основные тенденции языкового развития в современных государствах. Введение в этнолингвистику. Санкт-Петербург: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та. 34–45.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-31

Issue

Section

ARCHIVES, DOCUMENTS, EVIDENCES

How to Cite

Kļavinska, A. (2008). THE ETHNOLINGUISTIC SITUATION IN INDRA MUNICIPALITY IN THE RURAL PART OF KRĀSLAVA REGION. Via Latgalica, 1, 144-150. https://doi.org/10.17770/latg2008.1.1591