Lichens as Indicators of the Urban Environment Quality

Authors

  • N. B. Istomina Pskov State University
  • O. V. Likhacheva Pskov State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2013vol3.872

Keywords:

lichenoindication, lichens, sensitive and tolerant species

Abstract

The ranging of lichens among classes of poleotolerance were made. The most widely spread species from each class are mentioned. The estimation of the ecological state of air environment of the city of Pskov with lichens was held.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baibakov E.I. Assessment of the environmental condition of urban areas using methods of lichen indication (by the example of Kazan’). Synopsis of a thesis. Izhevsk, 2003, 19 pp. [In Russian]

Byazrov L.G. Lichens in the environmental monitoring. Moscow, 2002, 336 pp. [In Russian]

Malysheva N.V. Lichens of Saint-Petersburg. SaintPetersburg, 2003, 100 pp. [In Russian]

Malysheva N.V. Lichens of the city of Pskov. 1. Brief analysis of lichen flora. Botanical journal. 2004. Vol. 89. №7, pp. 1070-1077. [In Russian]

Paukov A.G. Lichen flora of urban ecosystems. Synopsis of the thesis. Yekaterinburg, 2001, 18 pp. [In Russian]

Sionova N.A. Assessment of the ecological state of the atmospheric environment in the city of Krasnodar by the methods of lichenoindication. Synopsis of the thesis. Krasnodar, 2006, 20 pp. [In Russian]

Suetina Y.G. Changes in epiphytic lichen flora and Xanthoria parietina (L.) Th. Fr. population structure in an urban environment. Synopsis of the thesis. Yoshkar-Ola, 1999, 26 pp. [In Russian]

Trass H.H. Classes of poleotolerance of lichens and environmental monitoring. Problems of ecological monitoring and modeling of ecosystems. Leningrad, 1985. Vol. 7. pp. 122-137. [In Russian]

Environmental monitoring of the urban area with the bioindication methods (by the example of the city of Pskov. Part 1. Pskov, 2009, 188 pp. [In Russian]

Downloads

Published

2015-08-09

How to Cite

[1]
N. B. Istomina and O. V. Likhacheva, “Lichens as Indicators of the Urban Environment Quality”, ETR, vol. 3, pp. 20–21, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.17770/etr2013vol3.872.