PRODUCTIVITY OF DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS DEPENDING ON METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS AND GROWING MANNER IN LATGALE 2018–2020

Authors

  • Kintija Pekša Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Viļāni
  • Arnis Justs Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Agriculture Science Centre of Latgale, Viļāni
  • Veneranda Stramkale Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Agriculture Science Centre of Latgale, Viļāni
  • Aldis Stramkalis Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Agriculture Science Centre of Latgale, Viļāni
  • Sanita Zute Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Stende

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol1.6636

Keywords:

growing conditions, varieties, Latvia, yield

Abstract

In recent decades in Latvia and other European countries increased interest about growing protein-rich crops and especially soybeans (Glycine max). Although soybean cultivation experiments in Latvia have been carried out for some time, there is still insufficient knowledge about cultivating these plants in the country's climatic conditions. A field trials was carried out in 2018, 2019 and 2020 in the Latgale Agricultural Science Centre. The effect of three factors (A: soybean cultivar (A1 — ‘Lajma’, A2 — ‘Laulema’, A3 — ‘Merlin’, A4 — ‘Tiguan’, A5 — ‘Paradis’, A6 — ‘Touttis’); B: sowing rate (B1 — 40, B2 — 50, B3 — 60 germinable seeds per 1 m2); C: row spacing (C1 — 12.5 cm, C2 — 25 cm) on the development and yield formation of soybean was examined. The experiment was carried out in the framework of the project ‘New technologies and important to look for earlier cultivars to avoid farming risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apstiprinātās platības par kultūrām un atbalsta veidiem 2020. gadā (2021). [viewed: 20 February 2021]. Avalaible: https://www.lad.gov.lv/lv/statistika/platibu-maksajumi/periods-2004-2016/statistikas-dati-par-2020-gadu/

Colletti A., Attrovio A., Boffa L., Mantegna S., Cravotto G. (2020). Valorisation of By-Products from Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Processing. Molecules, Vol. 25, article 2129; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25092129

Dogan E., Kirnak H., Copur O. (2007). Deficit irrigations during soybean reproductive stages andCROPGRO-soybean simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions. Field Crops Research 103 pp. 154–159

EUROstat: Agricultural production – crops. [viewed: 20 February 2021]. Avalaible:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=Agricultural_production_- _crops#Oilseeds.

Holdsworth M. (1964). The leaf movementsof soybean, a short-day plant. Journal of Experimental Botany, Volume 15, No. 44, pp. 391-398.

Lewandowska S. (2016). Perspectives of soybean cultivation in Poland. [Online] [viewed: 16 February 2021]. Avalaible: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304898171_Perspectives_of_soybean_cultivation_in_Poland.

Masudaa T., Goldsmith P.D. (2009). World Soybean Production: Area Harvested, Yield, and Long-Term Projections. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 12, Issue 4, p. 143–162

Sarja L., Malceniece I. (1990) Introducētās sojas šķirnes un formas. Tautaismniecībā derīgo augu bioķīmija un bioloģija. Zināta, Rīga, pp. 28–37.

Schutte M., Nleya, T. (2019). Row Spacing and Seeding Rate Effects on Soybean Seed Yield. Soybean - Biomass,Yield and Productivity. . [viewed: 28 February 2021]. Avalaible:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Row-Spacing-and-Seeding-Rate-Effects-on-Soybean-Schutte-Nleya/2df35bc6d98ac70af4d3a7c80b45690e19d90e13

Umburanas R.C., Yokoyama A.H., Balena L., Dourado-Neto D. (2019). Soybean yield in different sowing dates and seeding rates in a subtropical environment. International Journal of Plant Production, Vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 117–128.

Wienda-Piesik A., Kasek M. (2016). Productivity of early maturing cultivars of soybeans (Glycine maxL.Merr) in North-Western Poland. In: Conference Paper of 14th ESA Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, 5–9 September, 2016, pp. 25–26.

Zute S,. Damškalne M., Jansone I., Morozova I., Justs A. (2020). Sojas šķirņu ražība Latvijas agroklimatiskajos apstākļos 2018. un 2019. gadā. Zinātniski praktiskā konference “LĪDZSVAROTA LAUKSAIMNIECĪBA”. LLU:Jelgava, 40–45lpp.

Грибанов А.Н. (2004). Нормы высева и способы посева разных по скороспелости сортов сои в северной лесостепи ЦЧР: Диссертация кандидата cельскохозяйственных наук. Мичуринск, 182 c.

Иванов В.М. Мордвинцев Н.В. (2014). Реакция сортов сои на норму высева и глубину основной обработки почвы на черноземах Волгоградской области. Фундаментальные исследования, № 6 (часть 3), с. 526–530.

Огурцов Е.Н., Гайовой А.Г., Белинский Ю.В. (2014). Урожайнось сои в зависимости от способов посева в восточной части левобережной лесостепи Украины. В кн.: Инновационные технологии и технические средства для АПК: Материалы Международной. научно-практической конференции молодых ученых и специалистов 27–28 марта 2014 г. Воронежский государственный унивеоситет им. Императора Петра І. –Воронеж, Ч. І, с. 185–190.

Пигорев И.Я., Данилова Л.В. (2009). Влияние нормы высева на урожайность и качество семян сои на серых лесных почвах Центрального Черноземья. Вестник Курской государственной сельскохозяйственной академии, Nr. 3, с. 57–59.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-16

How to Cite

[1]
K. Pekša, A. Justs, V. Stramkale, A. Stramkalis, and S. Zute, “PRODUCTIVITY OF DIFFERENT SOYBEAN CULTIVARS DEPENDING ON METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS AND GROWING MANNER IN LATGALE 2018–2020”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 206–212, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol1.6636.