THE PRESSURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN MEETING AND EVENT INDUSTRY UNDER THE COVID-19 INFLUENCE

Authors

  • Galina Bukovska Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences (LV)
  • Anda Mezgaile Vidzeme University of Allied Sciences (LV)
  • Andris Klepers Vidzeme University of Allied Sciences (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol2.6623

Keywords:

meeting and event industry, innovation, technology, COVID-19, business tourism

Abstract

The innovation in technologies is one of the principal external forces that has a direct influence on the competitiveness of the meeting and the event industry. Therefore, implementation and adaptation of the new technological solutions in it has continuously followed the innovations in technological industry itself. However, the COVID-19 pandemic with the following lockdowns has pushed the industry to search for new technological alternatives to innovate their way out of the crisis in a very short time period. This was the first time when all the events from small family celebrations and weddings up to the international conferences and product launch events, have had to be cancelled or postponed or could have happened only to a very limited extent and under strict regulations excluding any larger gatherings of people. The event providers were forced to find new solutions to continue their business and not to hibernate with the minimum downtime allowance granted by the state to the employees. Technologies supporting various types of online events became the ultimate digital tool that helped event planners to execute projects from the beginning to the end after March 2020. The purpose of the research is to explore these changes in the usage of the technologies in meetings and events organized in Latvia caused by COVID-19. The quantitative analysis of the structural on-line survey data provides insights on what extent technology adoption in meetings and events businesses has been before and during COVID-19 and what are the future prospects supplemented by the in-depth interview data and qualitative analysis. Authors are investigating what is the amount of virtual and hybrid events organized in Latvia before and after COVID-19, what platforms the organizers used for their virtual events, what is the level of satisfaction and what kind of challenges the event organizers faced in the process of adoption of new technologies. The results of this research not only state the current position within the framework of the industry, but also enriches discussion about the adoption of new technologies to innovate the way out of the crisis and could help in some degree to strengthen the productivity growth in a long term perspective.

 

 

Supporting Agencies
Latvia Convention Bureau - information support

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Rodgers, Conferences and Conventions: A Global Industry (3 edition). London & New York: Routledge, 2013.

J. Calvin, and L. ShiNa, “The economic importance of meetings and conferences: A satellite account approach,” Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 52, pp. 117-133, May 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.03.004

J.S. Olson, Historical dictionary of European imperialism. Greenwood, 1991.

R.C. Ford, and W. C. Peeper, “The past as prologue: predicting the future of the convention and visitor bureau industry on the basis of its history,” Tourism Management, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1104-1114, August, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.002

D. Getz and S.J. Page, “Progress and prospects for event tourism research,” Tourism Management, vol. 52, pp. 593-631, February, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.03.007

R. Davidson, Business Events. London: Routledge, 2019.

The World Tourism Organization, “Glossary of Tourism terms”, 2021. Available: https://www.unwto.org/glossary-tourism-terms. [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

J. Allen, R. Harris, L. Jago, and A. Veal (Eds.), Events beyond 2000: Setting the agenda. Proceedings of the conference on event evaluation, July 13-14, 2020, pp. 154-161. Sydney: Research and Education.

J. Swarbrooke and S. Horner, Business travel and tourism. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.

D. Getz, “Event tourism: Definition, evolution, and research. Tourism management,” Tourism management, vol. 29, no. 3, pp.403–428, June 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.07.017

D. Getz, Event studies. In S. Page, & J. Connell (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of events. Oxon: Routledge, 2012.

B. McKercher, “Towards a taxonomy of tourism products,” Tourism Management, vol. 54, pp. 196-208, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.008

D. Buhalis and R. Law, “Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the internet-the state of eTourism research,” Tourism Management, vol. 29, pp. 609–623, August 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005

J. Navio-Marco, L. Ruiz-Gomez and C. Sevilla-Sevilla, “Progress in information technology and tourism management: 30 years on and 20 years after internet – revisiting buhalis & law’s landmark study about eTourism,” Tourism Management, vol. 60, pp. 460–470, December 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.002

Union of International Associations, “International Meetings Statistics Report”, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://uia.org/publications/meetings-stats . [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

International Congress and Convention Association, “2019 ICCA Statistics Report: Country & City Rankings”, June 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.the-iceberg.org/research/2019-icca-statistics-report-country-city-rankings//. [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

M. Sikosek, "A Review of Research in Meetings Management: Some Issues and Challenges," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 61-76, 2012. Available: Ideas, https://ideas.repec.org/. [Accessed March 15, 2021].

O. Mubin, F. Alnaijar, A. Shamail, S. Shahid and S. Simoff, “The new norm: Computer Science conferences respond to COVID-19,” Scientometrics, vol. 126, p.1813–1827, Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03788-9

J. Wen, M. Kozak, S. Yang and F. Liu, “COVID-19: potential effects on Chinese citizens’ lifestyle and travel,” Tourism Review, vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 74-87, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-03-2020-0110

T.M. Wut, J. Xu and S. Wong, “Crisis management research (1985–2020) in the hospitality and tourism industry: A review and research agenda,” Tourism Management, vol. 85, August 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104307

V. Kaushal and S. Srivastava, “Hospitality and tourism industry amid COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives on challenges and learnings from India,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 92, January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102707

M. Breier, A. Kallmuenzer, Th. Clauss, J. Gast, S. Kraus and V. Tiberius, “The role of business model innovation in the hospitality industry during the COVID-19 crisis,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 92, January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102723

H. Pang, D. Wiercigroch and A. Sriharan, “Re-thinking conferences in medicine: opportunities and challenges of virtual delivery,” Can J Physician Leadersh vol. 7, no. 1. P. 52-56, 2020. https://doi.org/ 10.37964/cr24728

A. Margolis, J.T. Balmer, A. Zimmerman and A. López-Arredondo, “The Extended Congress: Reimagining scientific meetings after the COVID-19 pandemic,” MedEdPublish, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 128, June, 2020. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000128.1

M.R. Fulcher, M.L. Bolton, M.D. Millican, M.J. Michalska-Smith, J.P. Dundore-Arias, J. Handelsman, J.L. Klassen, K.C. Milligan-Myhre, A. Shade, B.E. Wolfe, and L.L. Kinkel, “Broadening Participation in Scientific Conferences during the Era of Social Distancing,” Scientific Life, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 949-952, Sept. 2020. [Online]. Available: Trends in Microbiology, https://www.cell.com/trends/microbiology/home . [Accessed March 16, 2021], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.08.004

A. Margolis, “How to Migrate from a Traditional Live Congress to a Hybrid or Totally Virtual Congress? A Case Study,” 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.acehp.org/p/bl/et/blogaid=613. [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

J.V. Milić, B. Ehrler, C. Molina, M. Saliba and J. Bisquert, “Online Meetings in Times of Global Crisis: Toward Sustainable Conferencing”, ACS Energy Lett., vol. 5, no. 6, p. 2024–2026, May, 2020. Available: ACS Publications https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01070. [Accessed: March 19, 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01070

Z. Hameed, Y. Tanidir, N. Naik, J. Yuen-Chun Teoh, M. Shah, M.L. Wroclawski, A.B. Kunjibettu, D. Castellani, S. Ibrahim, R. D. Silva, B. Rai, J. Rosette, Rajeev, V, Gauhar and B. Somani, “Will “Hybrid” Meetings Replace Face-To-Face Meetings Post COVID-19 Era? Perceptions and Views From The Urological Community,” Urology, Feb. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.001

E.C. Buxton, E.C. Burns, and James E. De Muth, “Professional Development Webinars for Pharmacists,” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, vol. 76, no. 8, p.1, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.ajpe.org/. [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

N. Dua, M. Fyrenius, D.L. Johnson and W. H. Moos, “Are in- person scientific conferences dead or alive?”, vol. 00, p.1+, January 2021. [Online]. Available: Faseb, https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/. [Accessed March 15, 2021], https://doi.org/10.1096/fba.2020-00139

E. Albeniz, P. Roson, L. Hernandez-Villalba and M. Enguita, “Stay Connected and Up To Date. GI Meetings and Seminars and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 00, no. 00, p.1-5, Nov. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tige.2020.11.001

J. Hoods, T. Pakarinen, “From hybrid events to the next generation - interactive virtual events,” M.S. thesis, Lahti University of Applied Sciences. Lahti, Finland, 2018.

H. Hajibaba, U. Gretzel, F. Leisch, and S. Dolnicar, “Crisis-resistant tourists,” Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 53, no. 4, p.46–60, July, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.04.001

CMX, “The 2021 Community Industry Report,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cmxhub.com/community-industry-report-2021/ [Accessed: March 19, 2021].

C.M. Hall, Spatial analysis: A critical tool for tourism geographies. London: Routledge handbook of tourism geographies, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
G. Bukovska, A. Mezgaile, and A. Klepers, “THE PRESSURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN MEETING AND EVENT INDUSTRY UNDER THE COVID-19 INFLUENCE”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 44–50, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol2.6623.