GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET RESPONSES: PROFILE OF PRIME MINISTER KRIŠJĀNIS KARIŅŠ IN SELECTED DIGITAL MEDIA USERS’ COMMENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Authors

  • Vineta Kleinberga Faculty of European Studies, Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol2.6571

Keywords:

COVID-19, audience perception, internet comments, Kariņš, Latvia

Abstract

Perceptions play a pivotal role in assessment of efficiency of government communication. Informed by the strategic narrative conceptual framework this study looks at perception of government communication in Internet comments during three essential dates in conquering the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia: introduction of emergency situations on March 12 and November 6, 2020, and introduction of a curfew on December 29, 2020. The study uncovers how often and how the main spokesperson in government communication – the Prime Minister of Latvia Krišjānis Kariņš – is framed in comments of three online news media in Latvia (Apollo, Delfi, Tvnet) in Latvian and Russian. Using a digital tool for online comments analysis - the Index of Internet Aggressiveness (IIA), a data set is created of 244 comments, containing a key word “Kariņš” in various cases in Latvian and Russian. Qualitative content analysis is applied to extract and to compare the frequency of appearance and the framing of Kariņš over the course of the pandemic in Latvia. The findings reveal that Kariņš appears in comments significantly more after news in Latvian than in Russian, and has been commented five times more in Delfi than in Tvnet and Apollo together. The comments in Latvian are more aggressive than in Russian, and their emotional tone increases towards the end of 2020. In majority of comments the framing is negative involving attributes of irresponsibility, superficiality, indecisiveness and danger; yet positively framed rigidity and decisiveness of Kariņš can be observed too.

IIA is an online comment analysis tool, incorporating a machine learning program, which analyses users’ comments on news on online news sites according to pre-selected keywords to grasp the commenters’ verbal aggressiveness. In March 2021 the IIA data set consists of ~25.08 million comments; ~ 616.62 million word usage in written commenting and ~ 1357.40 thousand news.

 

Supporting Agencies
Latvian Council of Science

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Devine, J. Gaskell, W. Jennings and G. Stoker, “Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature,” Political Studies Review, 11 August 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929920948684

S. Dryhurst, C. R. K. J. Schneider, A. L. J. Freeman and e. al., “Risk perceptions of COVID–19 around the world’,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 23, no. 7-8, pp. 994-1006, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193

M. Siegrist, L. Luchsinger and A. Bearth, “The Impact of Trust and Risk Perception on the Acceptance of Measures to Reduce COVID‐19 Cases,” Risk Analysis, 12 January 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13675

A. Miskimmon, B. O'Loughlin and L. Roselle, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order, New York, London: Routledge, 2013.

C. von Sikorski, “The Effects of Reader Comments on the Perception of Personalized Scandals: Exploring the Roles of Comment Valence and Commenters’ Social Status,” International Journal of Communication, vol. 10, p. 4480–4501, 2016. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5748

R. Spears and M. Lea, “Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication,” in Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication, M. Lea, Ed., London, Harvester-Wheatsheaf, 1992, pp. 30-65.

A. G. Zimmerman, Online Aggression: The Influences of Anonymity, UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 403., 2012. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/403

Gemius Audience, “Domains,” March 2021. [Online]. Available: https://rating.gemius.com/lv/tree/64. [Accessed 15 March 2021].RSU, VA, RTA, “Izvērtējums par valsts pārvaldes iestāžu, darba devēju, nevalstisko organizāciju sniegtā informatīvā un metodiskā atbalsta efektivitāti, mērķa grupu informēšanai atbilstošāko informācijas kanālu un veidu izvēli,” [Assessment of the effectiveness of information and methodological support provided by government institutions, employers, non-governmental organisations, and the choice of the most relevant information channels and types for informing the target groups] RSU, Riga, 2020. https://www.rsu.lv/sites/default/files/imce/Projekti/VPP_COVID/34_zinojums_final.pdf

G. Garkāje, E. Zilgalve and R. Darģis, “Normalization and Automatized Sentiment. Analysis of Contemporary Online Latvian Language.,” Human Language Technologies – The Baltic Perspective, vol. 268, pp. 83-86, 2014. https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/38008

RSU/IMCS UL, “Interneta agresivitātes indekss: Covid-19 versija [Index of Internet Aggressiveness: Covid-19 version],” [Online]. Available: http://barometrs.korpuss.lv/?from=2020-03-18&to=2021-03-18&site=lv&section=about. [Accessed 19 March 2021].

R. M. Entman, “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame After 9/11,” Political Communication, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 415-432, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176

I.Lopatovska, I.Arapakis, “Theories, methods and current research on emotions in library and information science, information retrieval and human–computer interaction,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 575-592, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2010.09.001

Commenter 1 on, “Video: 'Šī slimība nav apturama, bet ierobežojama' – Latvijā 'Covid-19' dēļ izsludina ārkārtas situāciju (plkst. 19:33) [Video: 'This disease cannot be stopped but controlled' – Latvia introduces 'Covid-19' emergency (at 19:33)],” Delfi, 12 March 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/video-si-slimiba-nav-apturama-bet-ierobezojama-latvija-covid-19-del-izsludina-arkartas-situaciju-plkst-1933.d?id=51958457

Commenter 2 on, “Noteiktos laikos Latvijā ieviesta komandantstunda [A curfew introduced in Latvia at specified times],” TVNET, 29 December 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.tvnet.lv/7143267/noteiktos-laikos-latvija-ieviesta-komandantstunda

Commenter 3 on, “Video: Cīņa ar Covid-19 – ko lēma valdība [Video: Fight with Covid-19 - what was decided by the government],” Delfi, 29 December 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/video-cina-ar-covid-19-ko-lema-valdiba.d?id=52795147

Commenter 4 on, “Covid-19 ierobežošanai no 9. novembra izsludina ārkārtējo situāciju; stingri ierobežojumi (plkst. 21:15) [For containment of Covid-19, an emergency declared from 9 November; strict restrictions (at 21:15)],” 6 November 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.delfi.lv/news/national/politics/covid-19-ierobezosanai-no-9-novembra-izsludina-arkartejo-situaciju-stingri-ierobezojumi-plkst-2115.d?id=52637311

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
V. Kleinberga, “GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION AND INTERNET RESPONSES: PROFILE OF PRIME MINISTER KRIŠJĀNIS KARIŅŠ IN SELECTED DIGITAL MEDIA USERS’ COMMENTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 78–83, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol2.6571.