PLAIN AND PVA FIBRE-REINFORCED GEOPOLYMER COMPACT TENSION SPECIMEN CRITICAL AREA SURFACE COMPOSITION ASSESSMENT

Rihards Gailitis, Andina Sprince, Leonids Pakrastins, Patrycja Bazan, Kinga Korniejenko

Abstract


For more than 40 years, low calcium alkali-activated cement composite, or in other words, geopolymer, has been around. In recent years there has been increased interest in this material and its properties. It is mainly due to the claim that geopolymer is the cement of the future. This claim is based on environmental factors. For instance, the CO2 emissions for geopolymer binder can be up to 6 less than for Portland cement binder. Most of the researches regarding geopolymer composite properties examine only mechanical and long-term properties in compression. There has been a lack of long-term tests in tension due to difficulties in performing them. As the tensile stresses are an essential part of structure assessment, it is necessary to evaluate new material properties as thoroughly as possible. Due to the nature of geopolymer specimen hardening (polymerisation), there is a difference in modulus of elasticity development and shrinkage caused by binding that could have factors that regular Portland cement specimens do not.

This article aims to evaluate the surface composition of plain and 1% PVA reinforced geopolymer compact tension specimens that have been subjected to creep and shrinkage tests. Specimen cross-section images were acquired using the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Using the quantitative image analysis method, amounts of cross-section composition elements are determined. Furthermore, the amount of cracks is determined and compared between plain and PVA fiber-reinforced specimens.

It has been determined that even though 1% of PVA fibre-reinforced specimens have lower tensile strength, their creep and shrinkage strains are lower, and the number of microcracks at the notch base of the specimen. Still, it has to be acknowledged that the amount of air voids in all analysed specimens is relatively high.

 


Keywords


Geopolymer composite, long-term properties, creep, shrinkage, quantitative image analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


N. Alharbi, B. Varela, and R. Hailstone, “Alkali-activated slag characterization by scanning electron microscopy , X- ray microanalysis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Mater. Charact., vol. 168, no. July, p. 110504, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.110504.

C. Shi, A. F. Jiménez, and A. Palomo, “New cements for the 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 750–763, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016.

W. Tu, Y. Zhu, G. Fang, X. Wang, and M. Zhang, “Internal curing of alkali-activated fly ash-slag pastes using superabsorbent polymer,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 116, no. December 2018, pp. 179–190, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.018.

K. Kermeli et al., “The scope for better industry representation in long-term energy models: Modeling the cement industry,” Appl. Energy, vol. 240, no. March 2018, pp. 964–985, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.252.

L. Sele, D. Bajare, G. Bumanis, and L. Dembovska, “Alkali Activated Binders Based on Metakaolin,” vol. 1, pp. 200–204, 2015, doi: 10.17770/etr2015vol1.204.

A. M. Rashad and G. M. F. Essa, “Effect of ceramic waste powder on alkali-activated slag pastes cured in hot weather after exposure to elevated temperature,” Cem. Concr. Compos., vol. 111, no. September 2019, p. 103617, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103617.

E. Linul et al., “Quasi-Static Mechanical Characterization of Lightweight Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Foams,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 416, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/416/1/012102.

S. Yan et al., “Effects of high-temperature heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical performance of hybrid C f -SiC f -(Al 2 O 3p ) reinforced geopolymer composites,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 114, pp. 289–298, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.011.

S. H. Kang, Y. Jeong, M. O. Kim, and J. Moon, “Pozzolanic reaction on alkali-activated Class F fly ash for ambient condition curable structural materials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 218, pp. 235–244, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.129.

L. N. Assi, K. Carter, E. Deaver, and P. Ziehl, “Review of availability of source materials for geopolymer/sustainable concrete,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 263, p. 121477, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121477.

M. Amran et al., “Fibre-reinforced foamed concretes: A review,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 13, no. 19, pp. 1–36, 2020, doi: 10.3390/ma13194323.

M. Nastic, E. C. Bentz, O. Kwon, V. Papanikolaou, and J. Tcherner, “Shrinkage and creep strains of concrete exposed to low relative humidity and high temperature environments,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 352, no. June, p. 110154, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110154.

I. Boumakis, G. Di Luzio, M. Marcon, J. Vorel, and R. Wan-Wendner, “Discrete element framework for modeling tertiary creep of concrete in tension and compression,” Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 200, no. July, pp. 263–282, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.006.

P. Rossi, J. L. Tailhan, and F. Le Maou, “Comparison of concrete creep in tension and in compression: Influence of concrete age at loading and drying conditions,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 51, pp. 78–84, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.04.001.

N. Ranaivomanana, S. Multon, and A. Turatsinze, “Basic creep of concrete under compression, tension and bending,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 38, pp. 173–180, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.024.

Z. Q. Cheng, R. Zhao, Y. Yuan, F. Li, A. Castel, and T. Xu, “Ageing coefficient for early age tensile creep of blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 262, p. 119855, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119855.

K. Korniejenko, M. Łach, M. Hebdowska-Krupa, and J. Mikuła, “The mechanical properties of flax and hemp fibres reinforced geopolymer composites,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 379, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/379/1/012023.

ASTM, “E647 - Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates,” ASTM B. Stand., vol. 03, no. July, pp. 1–49, 2016, doi: 10.1520/E0647-15E01.2.

A. Sprince, L. Pakrastinsh, B. Baskers, and L. Gaile, “Crack development research in extra fine aggregate cement composites,” Vide. Tehnol. Resur. - Environ. Technol. Resour., vol. 1, pp. 205–208, 2015, doi: 10.17770/etr2015vol1.199.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol3.6569

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SCImago Journal & Country Rank