PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TEAM

Authors

  • Inga Podjavo Information Technology Institute, Riga Technical University
  • Solvita Berzisa Information Technology Institute, Riga Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2017vol2.2543

Keywords:

Software development project management, human resource management, project team performance, sociometric method

Abstract

The necessity of finding the connection between the planning, decision making, actions and results create project management interest to an evaluation of the project team performance. By analyzing the team performance, determining successful projects and assessing results, members of such project will have the necessary information to avoid failures, to monitor the progress, to compare similar projects and move to defined goals. The objective of this paper is to provide guidelines for evaluation of the project team performance in the software development project. This paper summarizes measures for evaluation of the team performance, an evaluation objectives and it benefits as well as factors that may have an influence on the team performance. Demonstration example of the guideline usage has been provided.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Inga Podjavo, Information Technology Institute, Riga Technical University
    Master student in Information Tehcnology program of Riga Technical University
  • Solvita Berzisa, Information Technology Institute, Riga Technical University
    Solvita Berzisa holds a Doctoral degree and is a Docent and Researcher at the Institute of Information Technology of Riga Technical University (Latvia). She obtained her Dr. sc. ing. (2012), BSc (2005) and MSc (2007) degrees in Computer Science and Information Technology from Riga Technical University. Her main research fields are IT project management, project management information systems implementation and application, as well as project data analytics. She also works as a Team Lead at Accenture Latvia. She holds PMP and CBAP certificates and was awarded the IPMA Outstanding Research Contribution of a Young Researcher 2013. She is a member of PMI and Latvian National Project Management Association.

References

G. P. Sudhakar, “Understanding Software Development Team Performance,” in Scientific Annals of the’Alexandru Ioan Cuza’University of Iasi: Economic Sciences Series, 2010, pp. 505–513.

PMI, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge ( PMBOK® Guide )—Fifth Edition. PMI, 2014.

S. Cedergren and S. Larsson, “Evaluating performance in the development of software-intensive products,” Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 516–526, May 2014.

M. Kasunic, A Data Specification for Software Project Performance Measures: Results of a Collaboration on Performance Measurement. Software Engineering Institute, 2008.

N. C. Jones and A. W. Harrison, “IS Project Team Performance: An Empirical Assessment,” Inf. Manag., vol. 31, pp. 57–65, 1996.

E. Weimar, A. Nugroho, J. Visser, A. Plaat, M. Goudbeek, and A. P. Schouten, The Influence of Teamwork Quality on Software Team Performance, 2014.

W.-H. Liu and J. A. Cross, “A comprehensive model of project team technical performance,” Int. J. Proj. Manag., vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 1150–1166, Oct. 2016.

T. Dingsøyr and Y. Lindsjørn, “Team Performance in Agile Development Teams: Findings from 18 Focus Groups,” LNBIP, vol. 149, pp. 46–60, 2013.

G. P. Sudhakar, Software development teams : performance, productivity and innovation. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd, 2015.

R. Goatham, “What is Project Success? – Why Do Projects Fail?” [Online]. Available: http://calleam.com/WTPF/?p=3501. [Accessed: 12-Mar-2017].

R. de Oliveira Moraes and F. J. Barbin Laurindo, “Performance Evaluation of IT Projects - The Shenhar and Dvir Model,” J. Technol. Manag. Innov., vol. 8, pp. 3–4, 2013.

A. Neely, M. Gregory, and K. Platts, “Performance measurement system design,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 80–116, Apr. 1995.

C. Loch and U. A. Staffan Tapper, “Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 185–198, May 2002.

A. Neely and M. Al Najjar, “Management Learning Not Management Control: The True Role of Performance Measurement?,” Calif. Manage. Rev., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 101–114, Apr. 2006.

W. E. Deming, “THE PLAN, DO, STUDY, ACT (PDSA) CYCLE.” [Online]. Available: https://www.deming.org/theman/theories/pdsacycle. [Accessed: 01-Mar-2017].

Z. Jiang and P. Naudé, “An Examination of the Factors Influencing Software Development Effort,” Int. J. Comput. Information, Syst. Sci. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 182–191, 2001.

M. V Tatikonda, “Product Development Performance Measurement,” in The Handbook of New Product Development, Elsevier , 2007, pp. 1–22.

K. Schwaber, Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, 2004.

W. A. Scott and R. D. Cohen, “Sociometric indices of group structure,” Aust. J. Psychol., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 41–57, Apr. 1978.

М. Ю. Орлова, “Структурный анализ малых групп,” 1998. [Online]. Available: http://www.msun.ru/dir/ins_mgi/Metod/psi%5C01.doc.

A. H. Maslow, “A theory of human motivation.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 370–396, 1943.

N. L. Kerr and Tindale R.Scott, “Methods of small group research,” in Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, 2014, pp. 188–219.

P. Fernandes, A. Sales, A. R. Santos, and T. Webber, “Performance Evaluation of Software Development Teams: a Practical Case Study,” Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci., vol. 275, pp. 73–92, Sep. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-15

How to Cite

[1]
I. Podjavo and S. Berzisa, “PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TEAM”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 118–123, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.17770/etr2017vol2.2543.