Variability of estimated contamination extent depending on calculation methods

Authors

  • Rimantė Zinkutė Nature Research Centre (LT)
  • Ričardas Taraškevičius Nature Research Centre (LT)
  • Saulius Gulbinskas Klaipėda University (LV)
  • Žilvinas Stankevičius Vilnius University (LT)
  • Margarita Jankauskaitė Nature Research Centre (LT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.234

Keywords:

Background value, concentration coefficient, enrichment factor, upper threshold value

Abstract

The aim of research was to analyse the changes of contamination extent (E, %) estimated using two methods of background calculation by eliminating anomalies outside the interval mean±2s or median±2MAD (s is standard deviation, MAD is median absolute deviation) and optional normalisation. Two methods were used for estimation of background values (B) and upper threshold values (T) of Ag, As, Ba, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sn, U, V, Zn and selected major elements according to their contents in topsoil samples from football fields in less contaminated districts of Klaipėda. Then two different sets of B and T values were applied to the whole geochemical data set. After determination of two sets of concentration coefficients (Kk), four sets of enrichment factors were calculated: two simple (EF1) (normalisation by Al) and two complex (EF3) (normalisation by Al, K, Ti).  

Estimation of E using T values resulted in lower percentage compared to percentage of sites where Kk>1, EF1>1 or EF3>1, because the latter 3 indices depend on B values. Since all T values obtained by median±2MAD method are much lower (by 6-37.1%) than by mean±2s method, respective E is much higher: for 11 pollutants it is higher by more than 5% (range 6.3-34.2%). Since the absolute difference between B values estimated by two methods is much lower (only for Sn and Mn exceeds 5%) than the difference between T values, the influence of different B values on estimated E is much lower. Higher than 5% absolute difference between two sets of E estimated according to Kk>1 is observed for 5 pollutants, according to EF3>1 for 4 and according to EF1>1 only for 3 pollutants. So E estimated according to EF1>1 is least of all influenced by the method of determination of B values, besides, it usually gives the highest E.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. Reimann and R. Garrett, “Geochemical background –concept and reality”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 350, pp. 12-27, Nov. 2005.

A. Gałuszka and Z. M. Migaszewski, “Geochemical background – an environmental perspective”, Mineralogia, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 7-17, 2011.

A. G. Darnley, A. Björklund, B. Bølviken, N. Gustavsson, P. V. Koval, J. A. Plant, A. Steenfelt, M. Tauchid and Xie Xuejing, with contributions by R. G. Garrett and G. E. M. Hall, “A global geochemical database for environmental and resource management”, Earth Science Series, vol. 19, Paris, France7 UNESCO, 1995.

R. Salminen and V. Gregorauskienė, “Considerations regarding the definition of a geochemical baseline of elements in the surficial materials in areas differing in basic geology”, Applied Geochemistry, vol. 15, pp. 647-653, June, 2000.

T C. C. Johnson and A. Demetriades, “Urban geochemical mapping: a review of case studies in this volume”, in Mapping the Chemical Environment of Urban Areas, C. C. Johnson, A Demetriades, J. Locutura and R. T. Ottesen, Eds, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 7-27.

J. Matchullat, R. Ottesen and C. Reimann, “Geochemical background – can we calculate it?”, Environmental geology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 990-1000, July, 2000.

C. Reimann, P. Filzmoser and R. G. Garrett, “Background and threshold: critical comparison of methods of determination”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 346, pp. 1–16, June, 2005.

L. Håkanson, “Ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach”, Water research, vol. 14, issue 8, pp. 975-1001, Aug. 1980.

G. Muller, “Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River”, Geojournal, vol. 2, pp. 108-118, 1969.

A V. Gregorauskienė, R. Taraškevičius, V. Kadūnas, A. Radzevičius and R. Zinkutė, “Geochemical characteristics of Lithuanian urban areas”, in Mapping the Chemical Environment of Urban Areas, C. C. Johnson, A. Demetriades, J. Locutura and R. T. Ottesen, Eds, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 393-409.

L. Bityukova and M. Birke, “Urban geochemistry of Tallinn (Estonia): major and trace-elements distribution in topsoil”, in Mapping the Chemical Environment of Urban Areas, C. C. Johnson, A. Demetriades, J. Locutura and R. T. Ottesen, Eds, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 348-363.

C. Reimann and P. de Caritat, “Distinguishing between natural and anthropogenic sources for elements in the environment: regional geochemical surveys versus enrichment factors”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 337, pp. 91–107, Jan. 2005.

D. H. Loring, “Normalization of heavy-metal data from estuarine and coastal sediments”, ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 48, issue 1, pp. 101-115, May 1990.

F. J. Zhao, S. P. McGrath and G. Merrington, “Estimates of ambient background concentrations of trace metals in soils for risk assessment”, Environmental Pollution, vol. 148, pp. 221-229, July, 2009.

M. Kobierski and H. Dąbkowska-Naskręt, “Local background concentration of heavy metals in various soil types formed from glacial till of the Inowrocławska plain”, Journal of Elementology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 559-585, Dec. 2012.

M.-L. Chang, Y.-C. Sun, R.-A. Doong, S.-C. Wu and C.-T. Fu, “Concentrations and correlations of trace metals in estuarine sediments – interpretation by multivariate statistical analysis and elemental normalization”, J. Environ. Eng. Manage., vol. 17, no. 2, 143-150, 2007.

A. Cheburkin and W. Shotyk, “Energy-dispersive XRF spectrometer for Ti determination (TITAN)”, X-ray Spectrometry, vol. 34, pp. 69-72, Jan./Febr. 2005.

W. Shotyk, P. Blaser, A. Grünig and A. K. Cheburkin, “A new approach for quantifying cumulative, anthropogenic, atmospheric lead deposition using peat cores from bogs: Pb in eight Swiss peat bog profiles”, The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 249, pp. 281-295, April 2000.

A. D. Anbar, Y. Duan, T. W. Lyons, G. L. Arnold, B. Kendall, R. A. Creaser, A. J. Kaufman, G. W. Gordon, C. Scott, J. Garvin and R. Buick, “A whiff of oxygen before the great oxidation event?”, Science, vol. 317, pp. 1903-1906, Sept. 2007.

J. Ebbing, J. Zachowicz, S. Uśscinowicz and C. Laban, “Normalisation as a tool for environmental impact studies: the Gulf of Gdansk as a case study”, Baltica, vol. 15, pp. 49-62, 2002.

B. Rubio, M. A. Nombela and F. Vilas, “Geochemistry of major and trace elements in sediments of the Ria de Vigo (NW Spain): an assessment of metal pollution”, Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 968-980, Nov. 2000.

R. Taraškevičius, R. Zinkutė, G. J. Čyžius, M. Kaminskas and M. Jankauskaitė, “Soil contamination in one of preschools influenced by metal working industry”, in Environment, Technology, Resources: Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific and Practical Conference, June 20-22, 2013, Rezekne, vol. I (Environmental Protection and Monitoring), pp. 83–86, 2013.

R. Zinkutė, R. Taraškevičius and T. Želvys, “Major elements as possible factors of trace element urban pedochemical anomalies”, Central European Journal of Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 337-347, April 2011.

C. Reimann and P. Filzmoser, “Normal and lognormal data distribution in geochemistry: death of a myth. Consequences for the statistical treatment of geochemical and environmental data”, Environmental geology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1001-1014, Aug. 1999.

M. Díez, M. Simón, F. Martín, C. Dorronsoro, I. García and C. A. M. Van Gestel, “Ambient trace element background concentrations in soils and their use in risk assessment”, Science of the Total Environment, vol. 407, iss. 16, pp. 4622–4632, Aug. 2009.

H. L. Fleischhauer and N. Korte, “Formulation of cleanup standards for trace elements with probability plots”, Environmental Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 95-105, Jan. 1990.

R. Taraškevičius and S. Gulbinskas, “Pedogeochemical accumulating associations of education and learning institutions and sport stadiums in Klaipėda”, in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment, September19-23, 2010, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 781-784, 2010.

R. Zinkutė, Trace Element Technogenous Associations in Urbanised Territories of Lithuania. Vilnius: Institute of Geology and Geography, 2002, 200 p.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
R. Zinkutė, R. Taraškevičius, S. Gulbinskas, Žilvinas Stankevičius, and M. Jankauskaitė, “Variability of estimated contamination extent depending on calculation methods”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 337–343, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.17770/etr2015vol2.234.