Aldis Kaļva


The paper explores termination of the activity of a capital company if it cannot be reached at its registered office. For almost ten years, there is a grapple with a problem that limited liability companies are absent at their legal addresses or the consent of the owners of the property is forged to register the legal address of the company. Regulations have already been amended for several times with the aim of eliminating unfair practices, however, with little success up to now. Recently, in 2017, the amendments to the Commercial Law have come into force, which provides for the elimination of a capital company that will not be accessible at its legal address; therefore it is important to study the particular issue to determine the impact of the aforementioned amendments on the registration of a front company. As the aim of the paper was set to discover and analyse the problem of capital companies’ simplified liquidation if they cannot be reached at their legal addresses. Systemic, dogmatic and comparative methods of studying and analyzing normative acts and court rulings have been used in the paper.


capital companies; consent; counterfeiting; legal address; liquidation

Full Text:



Informatīvais ziņojums „Par komersantu juridisko adrešu regulējumu”. Tieslietu ministrija, 28.09.2017., [sk.16.05.2019.].

Grozījumi Komerclikumā. 15.06.2017. likums/LV, 128 (5955), 29.06.2017./Stājas spēkā 13.07.2017.

Komerclikums. 13.04.2000. likums/LV, 158/160 (2069/2071), 04.05.2000.; Ziņotājs, 01.06.2000.

Strupišs A. Komerclikuma komentāri. A daļa. Komercdarbības vispārīgie noteikumi (1.-73. pants). [B. v.]: „A. Strupiša juridiskais birojs” SIA, 2003., 87. lpp.

Augstākās tiesas Administratīvo lietu departamenta 2008. gada 20. marta spriedums lietā Nr. C27157403 (SKA-76/2008). Nepublicēts materiāls.

Grozījumi Komerclikumā. 16.06.2011. likums/LV, 99 (4497), 29.06.2011./Stājas spēkā 01.07.2011.

Informatīvais ziņojums „Par komersantu juridisko adrešu regulējumu”, Tieslietu ministrija, 28.09.2017., [sk. 16.05.2019.]

Krimināllikums. 17.06.1998. likums/LV, 199/200 (1260/1261), 08.07.1998.; Ziņotājs, 04.08.1998.

Informatīvais ziņojums „Par komersantu juridisko adrešu regulējumu”. Tieslietu ministrija, 28.09.2017., [sk. 16.05.2019.].

Latvijas Republikas Uzņēmumu reģistrs. Galvenā valsts notāra lēmumi, https://www.ur.gov.lv/lv/specializeta-informacija/galvena-valsts-notara-lemumi/ [sk.17.05.2019.].

gada 18. marta Galvenā valsts notāra lēmums Nr.1-5n/46, https://www.ur.gov.lv/lv/specializeta-informacija/galvena-valsts-notara-lemumi/?search=Nr.1-5n%2F46 [sk. 17.05.2019.].

Oficiālās elektroniskās adreses likums. 16.06.2016. likums/LV, 125 (5697), 01.07.2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v1i86.4031


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Administrative and Criminal Justice

This journal is distributed with an international license:

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License